PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) Menara Jutamas Sdn Bhd 2. ) Amcorp Global Limited (dahulu dikenali sebagai Tee Land Limited) PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Abdul Kadir Bin Haji Sheikh Fadzir
The court found the creditors had exhausted available enforcement against the principal debtor, the transfer to the Kuala Lumpur registry was valid and jurisdictional objections were academic, the claimed amount represented the judgment, costs and accrued interest within the statutory limitation period, and the debtor’s challenges lacked merit; therefore the debtor’s applications to set aside the bankruptcy notice and related affidavit were dismissed and permission to continue bankruptcy proceedings was and remained properly granted.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-928-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Menara Jutamas Sdn Bhd; Judgment Creditor: Amcorp Global Limited (formerly Tee Land); Judgment Debtor: Abdul Kadir bin Haji Sheikh Fadzir
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2023
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-928-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Appeal From Deputy Registrar Decision
- Outcome
- Debtor's appeal dismissed; debtor's applications in Contents 15 and 20 dismissed; permission to continue bankruptcy proceedings (Content 2) confirmed/granted.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement Against Guarantor, Jurisdiction to Hear Bankruptcy Proceedings, Requirement for Leave to File Bankruptcy Petition/notice, Limitation Period for Judgment Enforcement, Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Menara Jutamas Sdn Bhd
Judgment Creditor
Amcorp Global Limited (formerly Tee Land)
Judgment Creditor
Abdul Kadir bin Haji Sheikh Fadzir
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Appeal From Deputy Registrar Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court of Kuala Lumpur had jurisdiction to hear the bankruptcy proceedings
- 2 Whether creditors exhausted remedies against the principal debtor before proceeding against the guarantor as required by Insolvency Act 1967
- 3 Whether leave/permission was required before issuing a bankruptcy notice
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the creditors had exhausted available enforcement against the principal debtor, the transfer to the Kuala Lumpur registry was valid and jurisdictional objections were academic, the claimed amount represented the judgment, costs and accrued interest within the statutory limitation period, and the debtor’s challenges lacked merit; therefore the debtor’s applications to set aside the bankruptcy notice and related affidavit were dismissed and permission to continue bankruptcy proceedings was and remained properly granted.
Court Disposition
Debtor's appeal dismissed; debtor's applications in Contents 15 and 20 dismissed; permission to continue bankruptcy proceedings (Content 2) confirmed/granted.
Orders
- Applications by the debtor in Contents 15 and 20 dismissed
- Permission to continue bankruptcy proceedings as per Content 2 is confirmed/granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment