1. ) JANACOM KONSORTIUM SDN BHD 2. ) JANACON TRADING SDN BHD 3. ) JANATHANAN A/L GOVINTHA NAIR LE TOUR DU MONDE SDN BHD
The appeal was dismissed because the supporting affidavit for the extension was filed outside the 14-day period without the court's permission, the explanation for delay was solicitor error not a clerical mistake and therefore not a reasonable ground to exercise discretion to extend time, and absent a proper affidavit the court could not exercise its discretion to enlarge time or set aside the default judgment.
- Citation
- WA-12ANCvC-21-02/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: JANACOM KONSORTIUM SDN BHD; Appellant/defendant: JANACON TRADING SDN BHD; Appellant/defendant: JANATHANAN A/L GOVINTHA NAIR; Respondent/plaintiff: LE TOUR DU MONDE SDN BHD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2025
- Case Number
- WA-12ANCvC-21-02/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Application for Extension of Time to File Record and to Set Aside Default Judgment; Appeal Dismissed and Record Filing Application Refused
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed; appeal struck out/cancelled; application for stay of execution became academic
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Default Judgment (judgment in Default of Defence), Filing of Record of Appeal, Affidavit Filed Out of Time, Strict Compliance With Court Rules
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JANACOM KONSORTIUM SDN BHD
Appellant/defendant
JANACON TRADING SDN BHD
Appellant/defendant
JANATHANAN A/L GOVINTHA NAIR
Appellant/defendant
LE TOUR DU MONDE SDN BHD
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Application for Extension of Time to File Record and to Set Aside Default Judgment; Appeal Dismissed and Record Filing Application Refused
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should grant extension of time to file the record of appeal
- 2 Whether affidavit in support filed out of time without leave can be considered
- 3 Whether the delay was excusable (clerical error) or inexcusable (solicitor error)
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the supporting affidavit for the extension was filed outside the 14-day period without the court's permission, the explanation for delay was solicitor error not a clerical mistake and therefore not a reasonable ground to exercise discretion to extend time, and absent a proper affidavit the court could not exercise its discretion to enlarge time or set aside the default judgment.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed; appeal struck out/cancelled; application for stay of execution became academic
Orders
- Application at Annexure 3 for extension of time and for leave to file supporting affidavit dismissed
- Appeal at Annexure 1 (appeal against Sessions Court decision) is cancelled/struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment