YAHAYA BIN ABD RAHMAN JMB SPECTRUM SHOP/APARTMENT
The application to set aside the assessment was dismissed because the defendant failed to provide a reasonable and documented excuse for non‑attendance, did not seek leave to file the application one day late within the 14‑day period under O.35 r.2, and their conduct constituted an abuse of process; the court therefore exercised its discretion under O.35 to proceed and refuse the set‑aside, awarding costs to the plaintiff.
- Citation
- BA-A72NCvC-724-07/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Yahaya bin Abd Rahman; Defendant/applicant: JMB Spectrum Shop/Apartment
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2025
- Case Number
- BA-A72NCvC-724-07/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (guaman) / Interlocutory Application Decision (application to Set Aside Assessment)
- Outcome
- Application to set aside assessment dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Appear, Setting Aside Judgment, Order 35 Rules, Extension of Time, Abuse of Process, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yahaya bin Abd Rahman
Plaintiff/respondent
JMB Spectrum Shop/Apartment
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (guaman) / Interlocutory Application Decision (application to Set Aside Assessment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assessment hearing held in the absence of the defendant should be set aside
- 2 Whether the defendant provided a reasonable explanation for non‑attendance
- 3 Whether the one‑day delay in filing the application to set aside justified extension of time/leave
Ratio Decidendi
The application to set aside the assessment was dismissed because the defendant failed to provide a reasonable and documented excuse for non‑attendance, did not seek leave to file the application one day late within the 14‑day period under O.35 r.2, and their conduct constituted an abuse of process; the court therefore exercised its discretion under O.35 to proceed and refuse the set‑aside, awarding costs to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside assessment dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application to set aside assessment dated 26 February 2025 dismissed.
- Defendant to pay costs of RM1000 to Plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment