GAN SOON HUAT 1. SANBOS (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD 2. MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA
The High Court held the Industrial Court had jurisdiction to hear the applicant's constructive dismissal claim even though reinstatement was not claimed; the unilateral implementation of the Third Commission Scheme together with the removal of territory constituted a breach going to the root of the employment contract; the applicant's delay in leaving for about nine months was reasonably explained and did not amount to waiver; accordingly the Industrial Court's award was unlawful and irrational and was set aside and remitted for rehearing.
- Citation
- WA-25-260-06/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant: Gan Soon Huat; 1st Respondent: Sanbos (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.; 2nd Respondent: Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2019
- Case Number
- WA-25-260-06/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / High Court Judgment Allowing Application and Remitting Matter to Industrial Court
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed; Industrial Court award dated 29 March 2019 set aside; matter remitted to the Industrial Court to be heard before another chairman; costs awarded to applicant RM5,000.00.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Industrial Court, Contractual Variation, Judicial Review Grounds (illegality, Irrationality, Procedural Impropriety)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gan Soon Huat
Applicant
Sanbos (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
1st Respondent
Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / High Court Judgment Allowing Application and Remitting Matter to Industrial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Court has jurisdiction to hear a constructive dismissal claim where reinstatement is not claimed
- 2 Whether unilateral changes to commission scheme and removal of territory amounted to a breach going to the root of the employment contract (constructive dismissal)
- 3 Whether the employee's delay in leaving the employer amounted to waiver of the breach
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held the Industrial Court had jurisdiction to hear the applicant's constructive dismissal claim even though reinstatement was not claimed; the unilateral implementation of the Third Commission Scheme together with the removal of territory constituted a breach going to the root of the employment contract; the applicant's delay in leaving for about nine months was reasonably explained and did not amount to waiver; accordingly the Industrial Court's award was unlawful and irrational and was set aside and remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed; Industrial Court award dated 29 March 2019 set aside; matter remitted to the Industrial Court to be heard before another chairman; costs awarded to applicant RM5,000.00.
Orders
- Set aside Award No.1083 of 2019 dated 29 March 2019 of the Industrial Court
- Remit the case to the Industrial Court to be heard before another Chairman to determine remedies in accordance with law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment