1. ) GM AERO SUPPORT SDN. BHD. 2. ) Khoh Siew Kim 1. ) GENTING HIGHLANDS BERHAD 2. ) GENTING MALAYSIA BERHAD 3. ) FIRST WORLD HOTELS & RESORTS SDN. BHD.
Court of Appeal allowed both appeals, set aside the High Court orders dated 23.8.2024 and held that documents B106 and B108, having been filed, marked and used in open court, were public documents such that the Riddick implied undertaking ceased in respect of those documents; the Kuantan/Temerloh judicial review and originating summons were related proceedings (not collateral/ulterior) so leave was not required to use the documents; applications to strike out and to adduce further evidence were dismissed; costs awarded to appellants (RM50,000 and RM35,000).
- Citation
- W-02(IM)(C)-1518-09/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: GM Aero Support Sdn. Bhd.; Appellant: Khoh Siew Kim; Respondent: Genting Highlands Berhad; Respondent: Genting Malaysia Berhad; Respondent: First World Hotels & Resorts Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2025
- Case Number
- W-02(IM)(C)-1518-09/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals From High Court (judicial Review / Discovery / Committal Leave Issues) / Appeal Heard in Court of Appeal; Judgment and Disposal of Interlocutory Applications Delivered
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court orders set aside; interlocutory applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Riddick Principle, Implied Undertaking, Discovery, Use of Documents in Separate Proceedings, Leave to Commence Committal, Open Justice, Protective/sealing Orders, Res Judicata/issue Estoppel
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GM Aero Support Sdn. Bhd.
Appellant
Khoh Siew Kim
Appellant
Genting Highlands Berhad
Respondent
Genting Malaysia Berhad
Respondent
First World Hotels & Resorts Sdn. Bhd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals From High Court (judicial Review / Discovery / Committal Leave Issues) / Appeal Heard in Court of Appeal; Judgment and Disposal of Interlocutory Applications Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents obtained under compulsion (B106 and B108) remain subject to the implied undertaking (Riddick principle) after being filed/used/read in open court
- 2 Whether leave of court was required to use those documents in related proceedings (Kuantan/Temerloh OS and JR)
- 3 Whether the High Court order granting leave to commence committal and to use documents was appealable and whether the appeals are academic/premature
Ratio Decidendi
Court of Appeal allowed both appeals, set aside the High Court orders dated 23.8.2024 and held that documents B106 and B108, having been filed, marked and used in open court, were public documents such that the Riddick implied undertaking ceased in respect of those documents; the Kuantan/Temerloh judicial review and originating summons were related proceedings (not collateral/ulterior) so leave was not required to use the documents; applications to strike out and to adduce further evidence were dismissed; costs awarded to appellants (RM50,000 and RM35,000).
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court orders set aside; interlocutory applications dismissed
Orders
- Respondents' striking out applications (Enclosure 27 in Appeal 1518 and Enclosure 29 in Appeal 1548) dismissed with costs
- Respondents' further evidence applications (Enclosure 22 in Appeal 1518 and Enclosure 24 in Appeal 1548) dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment