LOK SWEE TIONG LAIN-LAIN 1. LOK SIEW CHOO 2. LOK CHENG HUA @ LOCK SIEW HWA 3. LOCK PEK YEN 4. LOK SIEW HOON
The applicant failed to discharge the legal burden to show a bona fide, extraneous justification for filing key affidavits after court deadlines; the court inferred tactical non‑compliance and, exercising case‑management and rules enforcement powers, allowed the caveators' application to exclude the late affidavits and refused the applicant's extension application.
- Citation
- JB-32NCVC-190-08/2019 (LAMPIRAN 61) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (pemohon) Applicant for Grant of Probate: Lok Swee Tiong; Caveator (pengkaveat): Lok Siew Choo; Caveator (pengkaveat): Lok Cheng Hwa @ Lock Siew Hwa; Caveator (pengkaveat): Lock Pek Yen; Caveator (pengkaveat): Lok Siew Hoon
- Court
- LAMPIRAN 61
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2021
- Case Number
- JB-32NCVC-190-08/2019 (LAMPIRAN 61) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Application (grant of Probate) / Interlocutory — Admissibility of Affidavits and Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application by caveators to expunge/out‑of‑time affidavits (Lampiran 61) allowed; applicant's application for extension/admission of late affidavits (Lampiran 63) dismissed; costs to applicant; further hearings ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Grant of Probate, Admissibility of Affidavits, Extension of Time, Caveat, Compliance With Court Directions
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lok Swee Tiong
Applicant (pemohon) Applicant for Grant of Probate
Lok Siew Choo
Caveator (pengkaveat)
Lok Cheng Hwa @ Lock Siew Hwa
Caveator (pengkaveat)
Lock Pek Yen
Caveator (pengkaveat)
Lok Siew Hoon
Caveator (pengkaveat)
Procedural Posture
Probate Application (grant of Probate) / Interlocutory — Admissibility of Affidavits and Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether affidavits filed after the court deadline should be admitted for consideration
- 2 Whether the applicant established a bona fide/extraneous reason (COVID‑19 in UK) justifying extension of time
- 3 Whether late affidavits were tactical, scandalous or prejudicial and should be struck out or expunged
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to discharge the legal burden to show a bona fide, extraneous justification for filing key affidavits after court deadlines; the court inferred tactical non‑compliance and, exercising case‑management and rules enforcement powers, allowed the caveators' application to exclude the late affidavits and refused the applicant's extension application.
Court Disposition
Application by caveators to expunge/out‑of‑time affidavits (Lampiran 61) allowed; applicant's application for extension/admission of late affidavits (Lampiran 63) dismissed; costs to applicant; further hearings ordered.
Orders
- Lampiran 61 dibenarkan (caveators' application allowed).
- Lampiran 63 ditolak (applicant's application for late filing/extension dismissed).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment