[Timbalan (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] GUY BOON LEANG

[Timbalan (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] GUY BOON LEANG

Amendment ordered by Court of Appeal was not read to accused when called to plead, causing real prejudice to his right to know the charge and to mount a proper defence; prosecution failed to prove essential elements (mens rea and use of glass as weapon) beyond reasonable doubt; omission was not a curable technical error under s422 KTJ — conviction unsafe and must be set aside.

Citation
W-09(H)-122-07/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Parties
Appellant: Guy Boon Leang; Respondent: Pendakwa Raya (Public Prosecutor)
Court
H
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
9 November 2021
Case Number
W-09(H)-122-07/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Court of Appeal — Judgment
Outcome
Appeal by accused allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; accused acquitted and released; prosecution cross-appeal on sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
Charge Amendment, Grievous Hurt (s326), Mens Rea, Actus Reus, Trial Prejudice, Appeal
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Charge Amendment Grievous Hurt (s326) Mens Rea Actus Reus Trial Prejudice Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Guy Boon Leang

Appellant

Pendakwa Raya (Public Prosecutor)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Court of Appeal — Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether amended charge ordered by Court of Appeal was required to be read when accused was called to plead and whether failure prejudiced accused
  2. 2 Whether prosecution proved mens rea and actus reus for offence under s326 (grievous hurt) including use of glass as weapon
  3. 3 Whether omission was a curable technical error under s422 CPC/KTJ

Ratio Decidendi

Amendment ordered by Court of Appeal was not read to accused when called to plead, causing real prejudice to his right to know the charge and to mount a proper defence; prosecution failed to prove essential elements (mens rea and use of glass as weapon) beyond reasonable doubt; omission was not a curable technical error under s422 KTJ — conviction unsafe and must be set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal by accused allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; accused acquitted and released; prosecution cross-appeal on sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • Rayuan perayu dibenarkan; sabitan oleh Mahkamah Sesyen dan pengesahan oleh Mahkamah Tinggi diketepikan.
  • Perayu dibebaskan dan dilepaskan daripada pertuduhan pindaan.