MOHAMMAD ANSAR BIN ABDUL RASHID Chong Chuan Long [PELIKUIDASI NAUTICAL WEALTH SDN BHD (DALAM LIKUIDASI) (NO SYARIKAT.: 201101006650 (934787-M)] PENCELAH HAI MING DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD.
The Court dismissed the application to set aside the Validation Order and dismissed the related prayers; because the primary relief was refused, the earlier refusal to grant a stay became academic and no stay was required. Costs were ordered against the Applicant to both the Respondent and the Intervener.
- Citation
- WA-28PW-47-01/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant / Perayu: Mohammad Ansar bin Abdul Rashid; Respondent / Liquidator of Nautical Wealth Sdn Bhd (in Liquidation): Chong Chuan Long; Respondent: Hai Ming Development Sdn Bhd; Company (subject of Winding Up): Nautical Wealth Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2024
- Case Number
- WA-28PW-47-01/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding‑up) Application to Set Aside Validation Order / Judgment (application Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed (prayers 1(i) and 1(ii) dismissed); earlier stay application (prayer 1(iii)) previously dismissed; costs awarded against Applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Winding‑up, Validation Order, Stay of Execution, Consent Judgment, Section 517 Companies Act 2016
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammad Ansar bin Abdul Rashid
Applicant / Perayu
Chong Chuan Long
Respondent / Liquidator of Nautical Wealth Sdn Bhd (in Liquidation)
Hai Ming Development Sdn Bhd
Respondent
Nautical Wealth Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
Company (subject of Winding Up)
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding‑up) Application to Set Aside Validation Order / Judgment (application Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex‑parte Validation Order dated 12.12.2023 should be set aside
- 2 Whether the decision of the liquidator to cause the Company to enter into the Consent Judgment dated 16.11.2023 should be reversed
- 3 Whether a stay of execution of the Validation Order should be granted pending disposal of the setting‑aside application
Ratio Decidendi
The Court dismissed the application to set aside the Validation Order and dismissed the related prayers; because the primary relief was refused, the earlier refusal to grant a stay became academic and no stay was required. Costs were ordered against the Applicant to both the Respondent and the Intervener.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed (prayers 1(i) and 1(ii) dismissed); earlier stay application (prayer 1(iii)) previously dismissed; costs awarded against Applicant.
Orders
- Prayer 1(i) to set aside the Validation Order dated 12.12.2023 dismissed
- Prayer 1(ii) to reverse the decision causing the Company to enter the Consent Judgment dated 16.11.2023 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment