1. ) Hajemi Bin Din 2. ) Penghuni-penghuni lain yang menduduki Di atas tanah H.S.(D) 9781 No. PT 9492 Mukim Bera, Daerah Bera Negeri Pahang Elite Agriculture Sdn. Bhd.
The Court held that the originating summons under O 89 ROC 2012 was inappropriate because the defendants had disclosed triable issues of fact and law (identity as Semelai aborigines, long continuous occupation, alleged customary/community title, and possible wrongful issuance of title by the State) that cannot be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C-02(NCvC)(A)-505-03/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Hajemi bin Din; Appellant: Penghuni-penghuni lain yang menduduki di atas tanah H.S.(D)9781 No. PT 9492 Mukim Bera, Daerah Bera Negeri Pahang; Respondent: Elite Agriculture Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 September 2021
- Case Number
- C-02(NCvC)(A)-505-03/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (decision on Appropriateness of Originating Summons Under O 89 ROC 2012)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order granting vacant possession set aside; Originating Summons dismissed (with liberty to file a writ)
- Legal Topics
- Indefeasibility of Title, Customary/community Title, Originating Summons Vs Writ, Vacant Possession Orders, Compensation for Deprivation of Land, Fiduciary Duty of State
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hajemi bin Din
Appellant
Penghuni-penghuni lain yang menduduki di atas tanah H.S.(D)9781 No. PT 9492 Mukim Bera, Daerah Bera Negeri Pahang
Appellant
Elite Agriculture Sdn. Bhd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (decision on Appropriateness of Originating Summons Under O 89 ROC 2012)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a registered lessee may obtain vacant possession under O 89 ROC 2012 against occupiers claiming customary rights
- 2 Whether summary procedure under O 89 is appropriate where occupiers claim prior continuous occupation and customary title
- 3 Whether indefeasibility of title under the National Land Code is defeasible by proven customary rights/tenure under the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 or common law
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the originating summons under O 89 ROC 2012 was inappropriate because the defendants had disclosed triable issues of fact and law (identity as Semelai aborigines, long continuous occupation, alleged customary/community title, and possible wrongful issuance of title by the State) that cannot be resolved on affidavit; accordingly the High Court’s summary order for vacant possession was set aside and the OS dismissed with liberty to the plaintiff to commence a writ action so that disputed facts and statutory issues (including possible compensation and joinder of State authorities) can be tried.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order granting vacant possession set aside; Originating Summons dismissed (with liberty to file a writ)
Orders
- Set aside High Court order of 16 February 2021 granting vacant possession under O 89 ROC 2012
- Dismissed the Originating Summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment