HARJIT SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH 1. ) JAGDEV SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH 2. ) AMARJIT SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH 3. ) RASHPAL SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH 4. ) MANJIT KAUR A/P UJAGAR SINGH 5. ) HARREMENDAR KAUR A/P UJAGAR SINGH 6. ) SARJIT KAUR A/P HARNAM SI
The plaintiff's pleadings failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action: the Bangsar property had already been transferred to the plaintiff pre‑death and the business proceeds were not shown to form part of the estate; allegations of forgery and lack of testamentary capacity were bare, unsupported and raised decades late, amounting to an abuse of process and susceptible to laches/res judicata; accordingly the defendants' strike out application succeeded and the suit was struck out with costs.
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-508-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- PLAINTIFF: HARJIT SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH; DEFENDANT: JAGDEV SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH; DEFENDANT: AMARJIT SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH; DEFENDANT: RASHPAL SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH; DEFENDANT: MANJIT KAUR A/P UJAGAR SINGH; DEFENDANT: HARREMENDAR KAUR A/P UJAGAR SINGH; DEFENDANT: SARJIT KAUR A/P HARNAM SINGH
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2024
- Case Number
- WA-22NCvC-508-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit Probate/inheritance Dispute / Judgment on Defendants' Striking Out Application Under Order 18 R19 Ro C; Suit Struck Out
- Outcome
- Defendants' application to strike out allowed; Plaintiff's suit against all defendants struck out
- Legal Topics
- Will Validity, Forgery, Fraud, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata, Laches, Limitation, Strike Out Application, Discovery
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HARJIT SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH
PLAINTIFF
JAGDEV SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH
DEFENDANT
AMARJIT SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH
DEFENDANT
RASHPAL SINGH A/L UJAGAR SINGH
DEFENDANT
MANJIT KAUR A/P UJAGAR SINGH
DEFENDANT
HARREMENDAR KAUR A/P UJAGAR SINGH
DEFENDANT
SARJIT KAUR A/P HARNAM SINGH
DEFENDANT
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit Probate/inheritance Dispute / Judgment on Defendants' Striking Out Application Under Order 18 R19 Ro C; Suit Struck Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action
- 2 Whether the deceased had testamentary capacity to execute the will
- 3 Whether signatures and notarised documents were forged
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's pleadings failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action: the Bangsar property had already been transferred to the plaintiff pre‑death and the business proceeds were not shown to form part of the estate; allegations of forgery and lack of testamentary capacity were bare, unsupported and raised decades late, amounting to an abuse of process and susceptible to laches/res judicata; accordingly the defendants' strike out application succeeded and the suit was struck out with costs.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application to strike out allowed; Plaintiff's suit against all defendants struck out
Orders
- Plaintiff's suit struck out in its entirety
- Costs awarded to the Defendants in the sum of RM15,000 to be paid forthwith by the Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment