Institut Intergriti Malaysia 1. ) Roziah binti Harun 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA
On the facts the Institute is an agency of the Prime Minister's Office — established as the operational body for national integrity/anti-corruption policy, funded and overseen by PMO/GIACC, with board and administrative links — therefore s.52 IRA 1967 applies to oust the Industrial Court's jurisdiction and the Institute validly relied on s.29(fa) to have the reference struck out; the High Court erred in quashing the Industrial Court Award and remitting the matter.
- Citation
- W-01(A)-172-04/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Institut Integriti Malaysia; First Respondent: Roziah binti Harun; Second Respondent: Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2024
- Case Number
- W-01(A)-172-04/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order of 7 March 2023 set aside; Industrial Court Award No.129/2022 reinstated; case struck out for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdictional Ouster Under S.52 IRA 1967, Strike Off Power S.29(fa) IRA 1967, Judicial Review (certiorari and Mandamus), Status as Government Agency Vs Company Limited by Guarantee, Statutory Authority, Procedural Requirement to Challenge Minister's Reference (kathiravelu)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Institut Integriti Malaysia
Appellant
Roziah binti Harun
First Respondent
Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Institut Integriti Malaysia is a government agency within s.52 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 so as to oust Industrial Court jurisdiction
- 2 Whether a jurisdictional objection under s.52 may be raised by s.29(fa) application in the Industrial Court or must be challenged by judicial review (per Kathiravelu)
- 3 Whether the Industrial Court and High Court erred in law in their respective findings and remedies
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts the Institute is an agency of the Prime Minister's Office — established as the operational body for national integrity/anti-corruption policy, funded and overseen by PMO/GIACC, with board and administrative links — therefore s.52 IRA 1967 applies to oust the Industrial Court's jurisdiction and the Institute validly relied on s.29(fa) to have the reference struck out; the High Court erred in quashing the Industrial Court Award and remitting the matter.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order of 7 March 2023 set aside; Industrial Court Award No.129/2022 reinstated; case struck out for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- High Court order dated 7 March 2023 set aside
- Industrial Court Award No.129/2022 dated 19 January 2022 reinstated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment