1. ) ITH EAMY 2. ) DIONG YEOU CHIN
The prosecution proved all essential ingredients of s.12 Act 670 beyond reasonable doubt: acquisition and retention of victims for labour exploitation via deception and illegal entry, retention of passports, coercive debt bondage, confinement and threats; evidence established joint intention by T1 and T2. Accordingly both defendants were convicted on all charges and sentenced; compensation under s.66A was appropriate and quantified by the Court.
- Citation
- BL-62ATIP-67-09/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya; Defendant: Ith Eamy; Defendant: Diong Yeou Chin
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2024
- Case Number
- BL-62ATIP-67-09/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Human Trafficking (atipsom) / Judgment and Sentencing at Sessions Court
- Outcome
- Both defendants convicted on all counts under s.12 Act 670 read with s.34 Penal Code and sentenced; compensation orders made under s.66A Act 670
- Legal Topics
- Forced Labour, Debt Bondage, Exploitation, Coercion, Common Intention, Compensation Under S66 a, Sentencing
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecutor
Ith Eamy
Defendant
Diong Yeou Chin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Human Trafficking (atipsom) / Judgment and Sentencing at Sessions Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved elements of offence under s.12 Anti‑Trafficking in Persons and Anti‑Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (Act 670)
- 2 Whether the defendants jointly intended to traffic and exploit the victims (common intention s.34 Penal Code)
- 3 Whether the victims were subjected to exploitation/forced labour, debt bondage, retention of passports and confinement
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution proved all essential ingredients of s.12 Act 670 beyond reasonable doubt: acquisition and retention of victims for labour exploitation via deception and illegal entry, retention of passports, coercive debt bondage, confinement and threats; evidence established joint intention by T1 and T2. Accordingly both defendants were convicted on all charges and sentenced; compensation under s.66A was appropriate and quantified by the Court.
Court Disposition
Both defendants convicted on all counts under s.12 Act 670 read with s.34 Penal Code and sentenced; compensation orders made under s.66A Act 670
Orders
- Both defendants convicted on all counts
- For offence involving SP1 (case BL-62ATIP-66-09/2022): each defendant sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and fined MYR 5,000; default in payment of fine: 6 months imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment