1. ) JAHIT BIN RAHMAT 2. ) Yusli Bin Ismail 1. ) Ng Kim Chooi 2. ) Mohamad Bin Sidin 3. ) Majlis Perbandaran Klang 4. ) PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KLANG
On the balance of probabilities the court found the pre-computation plan and Borang 9B contained forged signatures (including signature attributed to a deceased co-owner), D2 was not appointed and acted dishonestly and in breach of professional duties, D1 was grossly negligent (imputing fraud), and D4 processed and approved the partition negligently and not in good faith; accordingly the partition and the issued titles are null and void, plaintiffs entitled to declaratory relief, injunctions, general and exemplary damages and costs.
- Citation
- BA-23NCvC-22-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jahit bin Rahmat; Plaintiff: Yusli bin Ismail; Defendant: Ng Kim Chooi; Defendant: Mohamad bin Sidin (MHS Survey Consultant); Defendant: Majlis Perbandaran Klang; Defendant: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Klang
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2023
- Case Number
- BA-23NCvC-22-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (land Partition) / Judgment After Full Trial (high Court)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs; partition and titles declared null and void; declarations and injunctive relief granted; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Partition Under National Land Code, Forgery and Fraud, Nullity of Title, Statutory and Common Law Duty of Land Office, Professional Misconduct of Licensed Land Surveyor, Exemplary Damages
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jahit bin Rahmat
Plaintiff
Yusli bin Ismail
Plaintiff
Ng Kim Chooi
Defendant
Mohamad bin Sidin (MHS Survey Consultant)
Defendant
Majlis Perbandaran Klang
Defendant
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Klang
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (land Partition) / Judgment After Full Trial (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 whether beneficiary (P2) had locus to sue for deceased's estate
- 2 whether application and documents for partition involved fraud and forgery
- 3 whether partition and resultant titles are null and void
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court found the pre-computation plan and Borang 9B contained forged signatures (including signature attributed to a deceased co-owner), D2 was not appointed and acted dishonestly and in breach of professional duties, D1 was grossly negligent (imputing fraud), and D4 processed and approved the partition negligently and not in good faith; accordingly the partition and the issued titles are null and void, plaintiffs entitled to declaratory relief, injunctions, general and exemplary damages and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs; partition and titles declared null and void; declarations and injunctive relief granted; damages awarded.
Orders
- Declaration that the partition of Original Land (Geran Mukim 6048 Lot 2558) into HS(M) 39940 PT 66484 and HS(M) 39941 PT 66485 is null and void
- Injunction restraining D1, D2 and D3 from demolishing plaintiffs' houses and houses of their extended families on the 2nd Partitioned Portion built prior to issuance of the 2nd Partitioned Portion title
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment