ANN BINTI IBRAHIM JASON JONATHON LO

ANN BINTI IBRAHIM JASON JONATHON LO

The trust deed was not registered and its conditions precedent (repayment/discharge of bank charge) were unfulfilled, therefore the defendant had no registrable or enforceable beneficial interest to support the caveat; the caveat was wrongful and must be removed, with costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
WA-24NCVC-284-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff / Administrator of Estate of MZ Ariffin: Ann binti Ibrahim; Defendant: Jason Jonathon Lo
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
24 July 2020
Case Number
WA-24NCVC-284-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (removal of Private Caveat) / Judgment (high Court)
Outcome
Originating Summons allowed; private caveat declared null and void and removed; defendant's cross‑examination application dismissed.
Legal Topics
Private Caveat, Trust Deed Registration, Order for Sale, Registration of Trust, Costs
Land Law Trusts Civil Procedure Private Caveat Trust Deed Registration Order for Sale Registration of Trust Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann binti Ibrahim

Plaintiff / Administrator of Estate of MZ Ariffin

Jason Jonathon Lo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons (removal of Private Caveat) / Judgment (high Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant had a registrable or beneficial interest sufficient to support a private caveat
  2. 2 Whether the trust deed conferred an enforceable trust prior to registration and fulfillment of conditions precedent
  3. 3 Whether the caveat should be removed and costs awarded

Ratio Decidendi

The trust deed was not registered and its conditions precedent (repayment/discharge of bank charge) were unfulfilled, therefore the defendant had no registrable or enforceable beneficial interest to support the caveat; the caveat was wrongful and must be removed, with costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Originating Summons allowed; private caveat declared null and void and removed; defendant's cross‑examination application dismissed.

Orders

  • Declare the private caveat lodged by the Defendant null and void and remove it from the endorsement on the Title
  • Costs in favour of the Plaintiff against the Defendant in the sum of RM5000