J O Y G I A
The application was allowed in part because the passage of four years and the children’s greater ages constituted a material change in circumstances warranting expanded access; joint guardianship was appropriate but limited to major non-emergency decisions (name, gender identity, religion, major non-emergency medical decisions) to protect the children’s welfare given the parties’ different countries of residence.
- Citation
- WA-24F-286-11/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: JOY; Defendant: GIA
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2024
- Case Number
- WA-24F-286-11/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (family Custody/access Variation) / Judgment on Variation Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Orders, Material Change in Circumstances, Joint Guardianship, Child Access/visitation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JOY
Plaintiff
GIA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (family Custody/access Variation) / Judgment on Variation Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the variation application was vexatious/relitigation
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff established a material change in circumstances to warrant enhanced access
- 3 Whether guardianship should be joint
Ratio Decidendi
The application was allowed in part because the passage of four years and the children’s greater ages constituted a material change in circumstances warranting expanded access; joint guardianship was appropriate but limited to major non-emergency decisions (name, gender identity, religion, major non-emergency medical decisions) to protect the children’s welfare given the parties’ different countries of residence.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- Plaintiff granted virtual access to the children on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays for up to 30 minutes between 7 pm and 8 pm; Defendant must facilitate and not interfere
- For the three months from 19 September 2023 Plaintiff granted unsupervised access on the first and third weekends of each month from 10 am to 7 pm on Saturdays and Sundays
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment