J O Y G I A

J O Y G I A

The application was allowed in part because the passage of four years and the children’s greater ages constituted a material change in circumstances warranting expanded access; joint guardianship was appropriate but limited to major non-emergency decisions (name, gender identity, religion, major non-emergency medical decisions) to protect the children’s welfare given the parties’ different countries of residence.

Citation
WA-24F-286-11/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: JOY; Defendant: GIA
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
18 July 2024
Case Number
WA-24F-286-11/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (family Custody/access Variation) / Judgment on Variation Application
Outcome
Application allowed in part
Legal Topics
Variation of Orders, Material Change in Circumstances, Joint Guardianship, Child Access/visitation
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JOY

Plaintiff

GIA

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons (family Custody/access Variation) / Judgment on Variation Application

  1. 1 Whether the variation application was vexatious/relitigation
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff established a material change in circumstances to warrant enhanced access
  3. 3 Whether guardianship should be joint

Ratio Decidendi

The application was allowed in part because the passage of four years and the children’s greater ages constituted a material change in circumstances warranting expanded access; joint guardianship was appropriate but limited to major non-emergency decisions (name, gender identity, religion, major non-emergency medical decisions) to protect the children’s welfare given the parties’ different countries of residence.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part

Orders

  • Plaintiff granted virtual access to the children on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays for up to 30 minutes between 7 pm and 8 pm; Defendant must facilitate and not interfere
  • For the three months from 19 September 2023 Plaintiff granted unsupervised access on the first and third weekends of each month from 10 am to 7 pm on Saturdays and Sundays