PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN SALVATORE A/L MUNUSAMY PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN MOHD NURAIZAD BIN AHMAD LIAS
The court found that although the debtor's documented monthly liabilities exceed net income, the existence of additional allowances (Covid and overtime) and the use of credit cards render the debtor capable of meeting a modest instalment; the court refused to compel the debtor to obtain further personal loans because imposing such a requirement would unduly increase the debtor's financial burden; therefore a minimum monthly instalment of RM230, payable on or before 31 May 2022 and thereafter at month end until full settlement, is just and proportionate to enable recovery while protecting the debtor's subsistence.
- Citation
- JA-76J-139-05/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Pemiutang Penghakiman: Salvatore a/l Munusamy; Penghutang Penghakiman: Mohd Nuraizad bin Ahmad Lias
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2022
- Case Number
- JA-76J-139-05/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Saman Judgment Debtor Proceedings (debtors Act) / Execution (ja 76 J) / Post Hearing Judgment / Reasons on Examination of Judgment Debtor (keupayaan)
- Outcome
- Order made that judgment debtor pay RM230 per month to judgment creditor, first payment on or before 31 May 2022 and subsequent payments on or before the end of each month until full settlement; creditor's suggestion to require a personal loan was rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Judgment Debtor Examination, Instalment Orders, Capacity to Pay, Orders Under S.4(6) Debtors Act, Rules of Court Application (o.48, O.74)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salvatore a/l Munusamy
Pemiutang Penghakiman
Mohd Nuraizad bin Ahmad Lias
Penghutang Penghakiman
Procedural Posture
Writ Saman Judgment Debtor Proceedings (debtors Act) / Execution (ja 76 J) / Post Hearing Judgment / Reasons on Examination of Judgment Debtor (keupayaan)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment debtor has means and ability to satisfy the judgment debt
- 2 Whether the court may or should order the judgment debtor to obtain a personal loan to pay the judgment debt
- 3 What is a just and sustainable monthly instalment given debtor's income, allowances, liabilities and family obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the debtor's documented monthly liabilities exceed net income, the existence of additional allowances (Covid and overtime) and the use of credit cards render the debtor capable of meeting a modest instalment; the court refused to compel the debtor to obtain further personal loans because imposing such a requirement would unduly increase the debtor's financial burden; therefore a minimum monthly instalment of RM230, payable on or before 31 May 2022 and thereafter at month end until full settlement, is just and proportionate to enable recovery while protecting the debtor's subsistence.
Court Disposition
Order made that judgment debtor pay RM230 per month to judgment creditor, first payment on or before 31 May 2022 and subsequent payments on or before the end of each month until full settlement; creditor's suggestion to require a personal loan was rejected.
Orders
- Judgment debtor to pay RM230.00 per month to judgment creditor
- First payment to be made on or before 31 May 2022
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment