MEGA FOREST PLANTATION MANAGEMENT SDN BHD 1. PENGARAH PERHUTANAN NEGERI SELANGOR 2. PEGAWAI HUTAN DAERAH, PEJABAT HUTAN DAERAH HULU SELANGOR 3. KERAJAAN NEGERI SELANGOR
Appellant, as majority shareholder of MNSB, lacked locus standi to pursue judicial review of eviction and compensation because the legal interest and remedies in respect of the planted trees and related assets belonged to MNSB (now in liquidation); prior litigation and the winding-up judgment (declaring incorporation and JVA illegal) and the liquidator's conduct meant the appellant's monetary claim was subsumed in earlier proceedings or must be pursued by the liquidator or by statutory remedial routes; therefore no relief by judicial review was available and appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- B-01(A)-682-12/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Mega Forest Plantation Management Sdn Bhd; 1st Respondent / Defendant: Pengarah Perhutanan Negeri Selangor; 2nd Respondent / Defendant: Pegawai Hutan Daerah, Pejabat Hutan Daerah Hulu Selangor; 3rd Respondent / Defendant: Kerajaan Negeri Selangor
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2020
- Case Number
- B-01(A)-682-12/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appealed as Civil Appeal / Appeal to Court of Appeal After High Court Dismissed Judicial Review; Court of Appeal Dismissed Appeal (23 June 2020)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Locus Standi, Illegality of Company Incorporation and Contracts, Res Judicata, Compensation for State Takings, Separate Legal Personality, Liquidator Powers, Forest Produce Ownership
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mega Forest Plantation Management Sdn Bhd
Appellant / Plaintiff
Pengarah Perhutanan Negeri Selangor
1st Respondent / Defendant
Pegawai Hutan Daerah, Pejabat Hutan Daerah Hulu Selangor
2nd Respondent / Defendant
Kerajaan Negeri Selangor
3rd Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appealed as Civil Appeal / Appeal to Court of Appeal After High Court Dismissed Judicial Review; Court of Appeal Dismissed Appeal (23 June 2020)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether majority shareholder of a company in liquidation has locus standi to seek judicial review of state eviction affecting company assets
- 2 Whether appellant has proprietary or beneficial interest in trees planted by its subsidiary
- 3 Whether incorporation of subsidiary and joint venture agreement being illegal prevents appellant from claiming compensation
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant, as majority shareholder of MNSB, lacked locus standi to pursue judicial review of eviction and compensation because the legal interest and remedies in respect of the planted trees and related assets belonged to MNSB (now in liquidation); prior litigation and the winding-up judgment (declaring incorporation and JVA illegal) and the liquidator's conduct meant the appellant's monetary claim was subsumed in earlier proceedings or must be pursued by the liquidator or by statutory remedial routes; therefore no relief by judicial review was available and appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment