KNM PROCESS SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. 1. ) CECA GOLD COMPANY LIMITED 2. ) MBSB BANK BERHAD
Plaintiff may apply to the High Court under s11 notwithstanding a contractual multi-tier dispute resolution clause where clause permits court relief and s11 confers a statutory right; however, the court must refuse interim relief where the applicant fails to establish the required statutory and equitable thresholds — here the plaintiff breached the EPC Contract prior to COVID measures, the PB is an unconditional on-demand bond payable by the guarantor (2nd Defendant) and 2nd Defendant is not subject to s11, Singapore law governs the EPC Contract and expert Singapore opinion supported validity of the demand (COTMA did not invalidate it), s7 Act 829 was inapplicable, and plaintiff failed to...
- Citation
- BA-24C(ARB)-3-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: KNM Process Systems Sdn. Bhd.; 1st Defendant: CECA Gold Company Limited; 2nd Defendant: MBSB Bank Bhd.
- Court
- ARB
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 September 2021
- Case Number
- BA-24C(ARB)-3-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration — Interim Measures / Judgment on Originating Summons (inter Partes)
- Outcome
- Originating summons dismissed with costs; interim injunctions discharged
- Legal Topics
- S11 Arbitration Act 2005 Interim Measures, Performance Bond on Demand, Multi Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses, Choice of Law (singapore), Temporary COVID 19 Relief Statutes (act 829; COTMA Singapore), Force Majeure, Interim Injunctions, Ex Parte Disclosure Obligations
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KNM Process Systems Sdn. Bhd.
Plaintiff
CECA Gold Company Limited
1st Defendant
MBSB Bank Bhd.
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration — Interim Measures / Judgment on Originating Summons (inter Partes)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff must exhaust contractual multi-tier dispute resolution before applying to High Court under s11 Arbitration Act 2005
- 2 Whether Singapore law clause governs validity of demand on performance bond and whether Singapore's COTMA invalidates the demand
- 3 Whether s7 of Malaysia's Act 829 applies to excuse performance or invalidate a demand under the performance bond
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff may apply to the High Court under s11 notwithstanding a contractual multi-tier dispute resolution clause where clause permits court relief and s11 confers a statutory right; however, the court must refuse interim relief where the applicant fails to establish the required statutory and equitable thresholds — here the plaintiff breached the EPC Contract prior to COVID measures, the PB is an unconditional on-demand bond payable by the guarantor (2nd Defendant) and 2nd Defendant is not subject to s11, Singapore law governs the EPC Contract and expert Singapore opinion supported validity of the demand (COTMA did not invalidate it), s7 Act 829 was inapplicable, and plaintiff failed to...
Court Disposition
Originating summons dismissed with costs; interim injunctions discharged
Orders
- Originating summons dismissed
- Prayer 1 (declaration that demand was invalid) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment