LAILI BINTI ABDULLAH 1. ) FARIS RAZALI BIN ABDULLAH 2. ) NURUL AIN BINTI ABDUL HALIM 3. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Langat
The High Court found the Form 14A transfer was properly executed, supported by documentary evidence and registered in accordance with the National Land Code; Plaintiff failed to discharge the burden to show the instrument was insufficient or void under s340(2)(b); the land administrator acted within statutory duties and is protected; accordingly the originating summons was dismissed and the registered title in Defendant 2 was upheld with costs to defendants.
- Citation
- BA-24NCvC-1438-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Laili binti Abdullah; Defendant 1: Faris Razali bin Abdullah; Defendant 2: Nurul Ain binti Abdul Halim; Defendant 3: Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2023
- Case Number
- BA-24NCvC-1438-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil – Land/title Dispute (challenge to Transfer Recorded Under Form 14 A; Relief Under Specific Relief Act and Nlc) / High Court Judgment Dismissing Originating Summons; Appeal Lodged to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Originating summons dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Indefeasibility of Title, Transfer by Love and Affection (form 14 A), Section 340(2)(b) National Land Code, Specific Relief Act S41, Registrar Duties and Protection, Locus Standi, Effect of Bankruptcy on Title
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laili binti Abdullah
Plaintiff
Faris Razali bin Abdullah
Defendant 1
Nurul Ain binti Abdul Halim
Defendant 2
Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat
Defendant 3
Procedural Posture
Civil – Land/title Dispute (challenge to Transfer Recorded Under Form 14 A; Relief Under Specific Relief Act and Nlc) / High Court Judgment Dismissing Originating Summons; Appeal Lodged to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 3/56 transfer from Defendant 1 to Defendant 2 under Form 14A is void or insufficient and therefore defeasible under s340(2)(b) NLC
- 2 Whether the land administrator (Defendant 3) should be ordered to correct the register to remove Defendant 2 and reinstate Defendant 1
- 3 Whether transfers for love and affection require blood or near family relationship and who bears the burden of proof
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found the Form 14A transfer was properly executed, supported by documentary evidence and registered in accordance with the National Land Code; Plaintiff failed to discharge the burden to show the instrument was insufficient or void under s340(2)(b); the land administrator acted within statutory duties and is protected; accordingly the originating summons was dismissed and the registered title in Defendant 2 was upheld with costs to defendants.
Court Disposition
Originating summons dismissed.
Orders
- Originating summons dismissed.
- Plaintiff to pay costs of RM2,000.00 to each defendant (Defendant 1, Defendant 2 and Defendant 3).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment