BAYU SEMPURNA SDN. BHD. 1. ) PANG CHEE HUN @ PHANG CHEE HUN 2. ) LIEW SHIN LIAN 3. ) CHAI NYUK JIN 4. ) MERCES BUILDERS (S) SDN. BHD. (IN LIQUIDATION) 5. ) LAND CUSTODY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court was not plainly wrong: a constructive trust arose by operation of equity to protect plaintiffs who had paid substantial sums, taken possession and had subsisting SPAs; non-payment of the entire balance did not bar equitable relief; laches and limitation were not established against the plaintiffs; appellants' reliance on Official Receiver/bank consent did not defeat plaintiffs' equitable rights, and therefore the appeals were dismissed.
- Citation
- Q-02(NCvC)(W)-1365-08/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Land Custody and Development Authority; Appellant/respondent: Bayu Sempurna Sdn Bhd; Plaintiff/respondent: Pang Chee Hun @ Phang Chee Hun; Plaintiff/respondent: Liew Shin Lian; Plaintiff/respondent: Chai Nyuk Jin; Defendant/respondent (in Liquidation): Merces Builders (S) Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 9 January 2026
- Case Number
- Q-02(NCvC)(W)-1365-08/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination (grounds of Judgment) Appeals and Cross Appeals Heard and Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; cross-appeals dismissed; High Court declarations and orders affirmed in substance
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Specific Performance, Limitation, Laches, Caveat, Beneficial Ownership, Privity of Contract, Admissibility of Documentary Evidence, Unjust Enrichment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Land Custody and Development Authority
Appellant
Bayu Sempurna Sdn Bhd
Appellant/respondent
Pang Chee Hun @ Phang Chee Hun
Plaintiff/respondent
Liew Shin Lian
Plaintiff/respondent
Chai Nyuk Jin
Plaintiff/respondent
Merces Builders (S) Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
Defendant/respondent (in Liquidation)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination (grounds of Judgment) Appeals and Cross Appeals Heard and Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a constructive trust can be imposed despite non-payment of full purchase price
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs are beneficial owners entitled to specific performance upon payment of balance
- 3 Whether laches or limitation bars equitable relief
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the High Court was not plainly wrong: a constructive trust arose by operation of equity to protect plaintiffs who had paid substantial sums, taken possession and had subsisting SPAs; non-payment of the entire balance did not bar equitable relief; laches and limitation were not established against the plaintiffs; appellants' reliance on Official Receiver/bank consent did not defeat plaintiffs' equitable rights, and therefore the appeals were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; cross-appeals dismissed; High Court declarations and orders affirmed in substance
Orders
- Appeals dismissed and cross-appeals dismissed
- Each appellant (Land Custody and Development Authority; Bayu Sempurna Sdn Bhd) to pay costs of RM50,000.00 to the 1st to 3rd Respondents (plaintiffs), subject to allocatur fee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment