PERBADANAN PEMBAGUNAN PULAU PINANG Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Seberang Perai Selatan PENCELAH BHT LIVESTOCK SDN BHD
The High Court upheld the Land Administrator's award and dismissed the applicant's reference because the applicant failed to show the Administrator made a legal or material error in valuation; large differences in valuation evidence alone did not prove the award was wrong and there was insufficient basis to displace the Administrator's determination.
- Citation
- PA-15-48-09/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (paymaster): Perbadanan Pembangunan Pulau Pinang; Respondent (land Administrator): Pentadbir Tanah Seberang Perai Selatan, Pulau Pinang; Landowner / Interested Party: BHT Livestock Farm Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2022
- Case Number
- PA-15-48-09/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Acquisition Reference (rujukan Tanah) Under Land Acquisition Act 1960 / High Court Judgment (determination of Compensation)
- Outcome
- Applicant's reference dismissed; Land Administrator's award upheld
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Compensation for Structures, Treatment of Unlawful Structures, Valuation Methodology Dispute, Judicial Review of Valuation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perbadanan Pembangunan Pulau Pinang
Applicant (paymaster)
Pentadbir Tanah Seberang Perai Selatan, Pulau Pinang
Respondent (land Administrator)
BHT Livestock Farm Sdn Bhd
Landowner / Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Land Acquisition Reference (rujukan Tanah) Under Land Acquisition Act 1960 / High Court Judgment (determination of Compensation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Administrator's award was excessive and should be reduced
- 2 Whether structures not permitted by land use conditions must be disregarded in valuation
- 3 Which valuation (JPPH, applicant's valuer, respondent's valuer) is legally and factually appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court upheld the Land Administrator's award and dismissed the applicant's reference because the applicant failed to show the Administrator made a legal or material error in valuation; large differences in valuation evidence alone did not prove the award was wrong and there was insufficient basis to displace the Administrator's determination.
Court Disposition
Applicant's reference dismissed; Land Administrator's award upheld
Orders
- Applicant's rujukan (reference) is dismissed and the award by the Pentadbir Tanah is maintained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment