FARIDAH BINTI MD. LAZIM (NO. K/P :xxxxxx-xx-xxxx) (as the lawful holder of the Power of Attorney to AHMAD BIN ADAM (No. K/P :xxxxxx-xx-xxxx) EDHAM BIN ABD GHANI (NO. K/P : XXXXXX-XX-XXXX) (as the lawful Administrator to the estate of ABDUL
Service by A.R. registered post was not proven to comply with Order 10 r.1 endorsement requirements and the defendant only received the papers after the judgment‑in‑default was entered; therefore the defendant was denied the right to be heard and the judgment‑in‑default of appearance (Enclosure 6) was set aside (Enclosure 7 allowed).
- Citation
- JB-24NCVC-410-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (lawful Holder of the Power of Attorney to Ahmad Bin Adam): FARIDAH BINTI MD. LAZIM; Defendant (lawful Administrator to the Estate of Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Don (deceased)): EDHAM BIN ABD GHANI
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2020
- Case Number
- JB-24NCVC-410-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (land Subdivision Under National Land Code 1965) / Application to Set Aside Judgment‑in‑default of Appearance (enclosure 7) — Decision at High Court
- Outcome
- Application to set aside judgment‑in‑default (Enclosure 7) allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Land Subdivision, Service of Originating Summons, Judgment‑in‑default, Audi Alteram Partem, Administration of Estate
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FARIDAH BINTI MD. LAZIM
Plaintiff (lawful Holder of the Power of Attorney to Ahmad Bin Adam)
EDHAM BIN ABD GHANI
Defendant (lawful Administrator to the Estate of Abdul Ghani Bin Mohamed Don (deceased))
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (land Subdivision Under National Land Code 1965) / Application to Set Aside Judgment‑in‑default of Appearance (enclosure 7) — Decision at High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of the Originating Summons complied with Rules of Court 2012 (Order 10 r.1 and r.5)
- 2 Whether the defendant was accorded the right to be heard (audi alteram partem) prior to entry of judgment‑in‑default
Ratio Decidendi
Service by A.R. registered post was not proven to comply with Order 10 r.1 endorsement requirements and the defendant only received the papers after the judgment‑in‑default was entered; therefore the defendant was denied the right to be heard and the judgment‑in‑default of appearance (Enclosure 6) was set aside (Enclosure 7 allowed).
Court Disposition
Application to set aside judgment‑in‑default (Enclosure 7) allowed.
Orders
- Enclosure 7 allowed
- Judgment‑in‑default of appearance set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment