TAN CHIN HOCK @ SUNNY 1. ) MAJLIS PERBANDARAN KAJANG 2. ) PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR 3. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
On the balance of probabilities the Court found the original IDT authentic and that the impugned land existed but was removed from land office records during digitisation; the 2nd and 3rd defendants negligently failed to migrate and verify historical records and thereby caused an unlawful loss of the plaintiff's property right; as a result the alienation and title issuance that incorporated the impugned land to the 1st defendant were null and void insofar as they included the impugned land; plaintiff's limited declaratory relief (to set aside HSD 145180 PT 53620) was therefore granted and the 2nd and 3rd defendants were ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff.
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-195-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (heir): Tan Chin Hock @ Sunny; 1st Defendant: Majlis Perbandaran Kajang; 2nd Defendant: Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Selangor; 3rd Defendant: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2023
- Case Number
- BA-22NCvC-195-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land Title Dispute (torrens System) / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Land Title, Torrens System, Data Migration/digitisation of Land Records, Negligence by Public Authority, Indefeasibility, Limitation (continuing Wrong)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tan Chin Hock @ Sunny
Plaintiff (heir)
Majlis Perbandaran Kajang
1st Defendant
Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Selangor
2nd Defendant
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Title Dispute (torrens System) / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the impugned land existed and was owned by the deceased/plaintiff's family
- 2 Whether land office digitisation resulted in wrongful removal of the impugned land from records
- 3 Whether the alienation and issuance of title(s) to the 1st defendant were lawful and resulted in indefeasible title
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the Court found the original IDT authentic and that the impugned land existed but was removed from land office records during digitisation; the 2nd and 3rd defendants negligently failed to migrate and verify historical records and thereby caused an unlawful loss of the plaintiff's property right; as a result the alienation and title issuance that incorporated the impugned land to the 1st defendant were null and void insofar as they included the impugned land; plaintiff's limited declaratory relief (to set aside HSD 145180 PT 53620) was therefore granted and the 2nd and 3rd defendants were ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed in part
Orders
- Declare null and void and cancel title HSD 145180, PT 53620, Seksyen 3, Bandar Cheras, Daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor insofar as it includes the impugned land
- 2nd and 3rd defendants to be jointly and severally liable to pay costs of RM20,000.00 to the plaintiff (subject to allocator fees)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment