Nimalam Devaraja and Lam Rui Rong for the Applicants [Messrs Skrine] Mark Ho and Eldarious Yong for the Respondent Company [Messrs Chellam & Wong]
Leave was granted under s.471 because the assessment of account of profits involves unliquidated damages and a full hearing that cannot be adequately conducted by the liquidator or resolved in the winding-up process; committal proceedings are not execution against the company's estate and may proceed against directors despite s.472(3); filing a proof of debt for costs did not preclude the Applicants from seeking leave to continue separate AOP proceedings; there was a prima facie case and the balance of convenience and justice favored allowing continuation of the proceedings.
- Citation
- POST WINDING-UP NO. WA-28PW-358-10/2020 COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO. WA-28NCC-459-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicants: Dart Industries Inc. & Tupperware Brands Malaysia Sdn Bhd; Respondent/defendant: CMN International Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2020
- Case Number
- POST WINDING-UP NO. WA-28PW-358-10/2020 COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO. WA-28NCC-459-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up (companies Act 2016) With Related Intellectual Property Infringement Suits / Interlocutory Application Under S.471 for Leave to Continue Proceedings After Winding Up (assessment of Account of Profits; Appeals; Committal)
- Outcome
- Application granted in terms for prayers 1, 2 and 3 (leave to proceed granted)
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Continue Proceedings Under S.471 Companies Act 2016, Assessment of Account of Profits, Proof of Debt Vs Unliquidated Claims, Committal Proceedings Against Directors, Powers of Liquidator, Effect of Winding Up on Execution (s.472(3))
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dart Industries Inc. & Tupperware Brands Malaysia Sdn Bhd
Applicants
CMN International Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Winding Up (companies Act 2016) With Related Intellectual Property Infringement Suits / Interlocutory Application Under S.471 for Leave to Continue Proceedings After Winding Up (assessment of Account of Profits; Appeals; Committal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave under s.471 CA 2016 should be granted to continue assessment of account of profits proceedings and related appeals after winding up
- 2 Whether committal proceedings are barred by s.472(3) as execution against the company
- 3 Whether filing a proof of debt precludes seeking leave to continue separate proceedings for account of profits
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was granted under s.471 because the assessment of account of profits involves unliquidated damages and a full hearing that cannot be adequately conducted by the liquidator or resolved in the winding-up process; committal proceedings are not execution against the company's estate and may proceed against directors despite s.472(3); filing a proof of debt for costs did not preclude the Applicants from seeking leave to continue separate AOP proceedings; there was a prima facie case and the balance of convenience and justice favored allowing continuation of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application granted in terms for prayers 1, 2 and 3 (leave to proceed granted)
Orders
- Leave granted for the Applicants to continue legal proceedings including assessment of account of profits in High Court Suits WA-22IP-16-04/2017; WA-22IP-17-04/2017; WA-22IP-18-04/2017; WA-22IP-19-04/2017 (the Moorlife Suits)
- Leave granted to proceed with appeals including Civil Appeal No. W-02(IPCV)(W)-1868-09/2018 (and matters related to other appeals arising from the Suits)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment