PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN KOONG LIN LOONG (Selaku wakil pertubuhan The Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia) PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN NUR SYAFEENAZ FARHANAH BINTI ROSMAN
The appeal was dismissed because the procedural objection was res judicata and the application was properly before the Bankruptcy Court; the JC showed the JD was a partner/sole proprietor when the cause of action accrued (supported by Bar Council confirmation) and under s.11 Partnership Act and authority in Lee Choon Hei a partner at the time the cause accrued is liable to satisfy the judgment against the firm; internal partnership agreements do not relieve the partner's liability to a third party creditor; therefore leave to proceed against the JD stands and the appeal fails.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-1189-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Nur Syafeenaz Farhanah binti Rosman; Judgment Creditor: Koong Lin Loong
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2025
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-1189-07/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Leave to Commence Bankruptcy Proceedings / High Court Judgment on Appeal Against Registrar's Grant of Leave
- Outcome
- Notice of Appeal (Encl 60) dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave Under Order 77 R 5(4), Act of Bankruptcy S.3(1) Insolvency Act 1967, Liability of Partners S.11 Partnership Act 1961, Res Judicata, Estoppel, Summary Judgment Finality
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nur Syafeenaz Farhanah binti Rosman
Judgment Debtor
Koong Lin Loong
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Leave to Commence Bankruptcy Proceedings / High Court Judgment on Appeal Against Registrar's Grant of Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the leave application was procedurally defective (Notice of Application vs Summons in Chambers)
- 2 Whether the judgment debtor was a partner/sole proprietor at the time the cause of action accrued and therefore liable
- 3 Whether internal partnership agreements can relieve a partner from liability to a third party creditor
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the procedural objection was res judicata and the application was properly before the Bankruptcy Court; the JC showed the JD was a partner/sole proprietor when the cause of action accrued (supported by Bar Council confirmation) and under s.11 Partnership Act and authority in Lee Choon Hei a partner at the time the cause accrued is liable to satisfy the judgment against the firm; internal partnership agreements do not relieve the partner's liability to a third party creditor; therefore leave to proceed against the JD stands and the appeal fails.
Court Disposition
Notice of Appeal (Encl 60) dismissed
Orders
- Encl 60 dismissed with costs of RM4,000.00 subject to allocatur
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment