1. ) LEE KIT AUN 2. ) LEET KIT AUN (MENDAKWA SEBAGAI PEMEGANG AMANAH/PENTADBIR HARTA PUSAKA KEPADA CHANG TUCK MUN) 3. ) CHANG TUCK SIANG 4. ) LEE KIT AUN (MENDAKWA DIBAWAH SURAT KUASA WAKIL SKW NO. 1103/09) 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Raub
The court held Form 2B issuance and the corrective process under s.15 and s.380 were lawful given the complaint and JUPEM plan confirmation; plaintiffs failed to show reasonable excuse for non-production of documents; the proposed corrections would not extinguish plaintiffs' titles or infringe indefeasibility; therefore the KM 32 application to set aside the Form 2B and obtain declaratory relief and cancellation was dismissed.
- Citation
- CB-24NCvC-60-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lee Kit Aun; Plaintiff: Chang Tuck Siang; Defendant 1: Pentadbir, Pejabat Daerah & Tanah Raub; Defendant 2: Pendaftar, Pejabat Daerah & Tanah Raub; Defendant 3: Pengarah, Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan, Pahang; Defendant 4: Cheah Kam Seng; Defendant 5: Tham Wai Fun
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2023
- Case Number
- CB-24NCvC-60-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal/judicial Review Under National Land Code (s.418) Challenging Form 2 B and Corrections Under S.380 / Hearing of KM 32 Application and Judgment (interlocutory/judicial Review)
- Outcome
- KM 32 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- National Land Code: Form 2 B (s.15), Correction of Title (s.380), Appeal From Decisions of Land Administrators (s.418), Offence for Non Compliance (s.424), Indefeasibility of Title, Cancellation and Transfer of Title
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Kit Aun
Plaintiff
Chang Tuck Siang
Plaintiff
Pentadbir, Pejabat Daerah & Tanah Raub
Defendant 1
Pendaftar, Pejabat Daerah & Tanah Raub
Defendant 2
Pengarah, Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan, Pahang
Defendant 3
Cheah Kam Seng
Defendant 4
Tham Wai Fun
Defendant 5
Procedural Posture
Appeal/judicial Review Under National Land Code (s.418) Challenging Form 2 B and Corrections Under S.380 / Hearing of KM 32 Application and Judgment (interlocutory/judicial Review)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Form 2B issued by Defendant 1 was lawful or should be set aside
- 2 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to declaratory relief as registered/beneficial owners of the subject title
- 3 Whether titles issued to Defendants 4 and 5 should be cancelled and replaced
Ratio Decidendi
The court held Form 2B issuance and the corrective process under s.15 and s.380 were lawful given the complaint and JUPEM plan confirmation; plaintiffs failed to show reasonable excuse for non-production of documents; the proposed corrections would not extinguish plaintiffs' titles or infringe indefeasibility; therefore the KM 32 application to set aside the Form 2B and obtain declaratory relief and cancellation was dismissed.
Court Disposition
KM 32 dismissed
Orders
- KM 32 dismissed
- Costs awarded RM10,000.00 to Defendants 1, 2 and 3 subject to the fee allocator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment