1. ) LGB ENGINEERING SDN. BHD. 2. ) RAYSTON (BUTTERWORTH) SDN. BHD. 3. ) RAYSTON CONSORTIUM (BUTTERWORTH) SDN. BHD. RAYSTON RESOURCES SDN. BHD.
The Court allowed the appeal: where an invalidating factor (the wrongful one‑share transfer) has been removed, prior resolutions invalidated solely for lack of quorum are curable; Members' Written Resolution No.1/2017 passed after commencement of CA2016 under s.303 validly ratified the prior corporate acts; s.303 was not being applied retrospectively to create rights but used prospectively to decide existing matters; the High Court erred in granting consequential orders affecting subsidiary subscriptions beyond the plaintiff's locus; validation under the statutory curative power is appropriate absent substantial injustice.
- Citation
- B-02(NCC)(A)-300-02/2019 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd; Appellant: Rayston (Butterworth) Sdn Bhd; Appellant: Rayston Consortium (Butterworth) Sdn Bhd; Respondent: Rayston Resources Sdn Bhd
- Court
- NCC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2022
- Case Number
- B-02(NCC)(A)-300-02/2019 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court orders set aside; Members' Written Resolution No.1/2017 declared valid and ratified; costs awarded to appellants
- Legal Topics
- Quorum Requirements, Members' Written Resolution (s.303 Companies Act 2016), Ratification and Validation of Corporate Acts, Pre Emptive Rights and Share Transfer, Ultra Vires and Curable Nullities, Minority Shareholder Conduct and Oppression
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LGB Engineering Sdn Bhd
Appellant
Rayston (Butterworth) Sdn Bhd
Appellant
Rayston Consortium (Butterworth) Sdn Bhd
Appellant
Rayston Resources Sdn Bhd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether resolutions declared void for lack of quorum could be validly ratified by a subsequent members' written resolution under s.303 CA 2016
- 2 Whether application of s.303 CA 2016 to ratify prior acts amounted to impermissible retrospective law
- 3 Whether High Court erred in ordering reversal of subsequent subscription/allotment in subsidiary beyond plaintiff's locus
Ratio Decidendi
The Court allowed the appeal: where an invalidating factor (the wrongful one‑share transfer) has been removed, prior resolutions invalidated solely for lack of quorum are curable; Members' Written Resolution No.1/2017 passed after commencement of CA2016 under s.303 validly ratified the prior corporate acts; s.303 was not being applied retrospectively to create rights but used prospectively to decide existing matters; the High Court erred in granting consequential orders affecting subsidiary subscriptions beyond the plaintiff's locus; validation under the statutory curative power is appropriate absent substantial injustice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court orders set aside; Members' Written Resolution No.1/2017 declared valid and ratified; costs awarded to appellants
Orders
- Set aside the High Court orders in Subsequent OS No. 51 relating to invalidation of Members' Written Resolution No.1/2017
- Declare Members' Written Resolution No.1/2017 valid and effective
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment