Kuganeswaaran A/l Selvam Zainal Bin Tajuddin
Trial judge failed to analyze medical and oral evidence and largely adopted plaintiff's claimed sums without reasons; appellate court was therefore justified to interfere. Quantum awards were varied where unsupported: right acetabulum reduced to MYR 30,000; right L3-L5 transverse process fracture reduced to MYR 40,000; Grade 1 renal injury reduced to MYR 12,000; extraperitoneal bladder injury reduced to MYR 10,000; bilateral gluteal laceration reduced to MYR 5,000; right foot drop award set aside (MYR 0); future prosthetic/supportive equipment award reduced by one third to MYR 369,233.34; pre-trial loss of earnings reduced to MYR 6,820.66 for seven months with 1/3 contingency deduction;...
- Citation
- JB-12BNCvC-11-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Zainal bin Tajuddin; Respondent/plaintiff: Kuganeswaaran a/l Selvam
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 April 2024
- Case Number
- JB-12BNCvC-11-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (personal Injury/motor Accident) / Judgment on Appeal (high Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed on liability; appeal allowed in part on quantum and awards varied as detailed; each party to bear their own costs of the appeal; Sessions Court costs maintained except specified deduction.
- Legal Topics
- Liability, Quantum of Damages, Special Damages, Future Loss of Earnings, Appellate Intervention, Costs, Medical Evidence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zainal bin Tajuddin
Appellant/defendant
Kuganeswaaran a/l Selvam
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (personal Injury/motor Accident) / Judgment on Appeal (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellate court should interfere with trial judge's quantum awards
- 2 Appropriate quantum for specific injuries (acetabulum fracture; L3-L5 transverse process fracture; renal injury; bladder injury; gluteal lacerations; foot drop)
- 3 Whether future prosthetic/supportive device costs should be discounted for contingencies
Ratio Decidendi
Trial judge failed to analyze medical and oral evidence and largely adopted plaintiff's claimed sums without reasons; appellate court was therefore justified to interfere. Quantum awards were varied where unsupported: right acetabulum reduced to MYR 30,000; right L3-L5 transverse process fracture reduced to MYR 40,000; Grade 1 renal injury reduced to MYR 12,000; extraperitoneal bladder injury reduced to MYR 10,000; bilateral gluteal laceration reduced to MYR 5,000; right foot drop award set aside (MYR 0); future prosthetic/supportive equipment award reduced by one third to MYR 369,233.34; pre-trial loss of earnings reduced to MYR 6,820.66 for seven months with 1/3 contingency deduction;...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed on liability; appeal allowed in part on quantum and awards varied as detailed; each party to bear their own costs of the appeal; Sessions Court costs maintained except specified deduction.
Orders
- Defendant remains 100% liable for the accident (liability upheld)
- Right acetabulum fracture award reduced to MYR 30000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment