MUHAMMAD AMIRUL ZAMIR BIN MOHAMED ZAHER D1) MOHD NUJAIMY BIN ROSLN D2) ROSLAN BIN MAN T/A ROSLAN BIN MAN
Court found evidence insufficient to positively infer the traffic light on the plaintiff's approach was functioning/green at the moment of impact; even if light had been green plaintiff failed to exercise required caution when entering the main road; liability apportioned 75% to defendant and 25% to plaintiff; damages for specific injuries awarded as assessed and proven special damages for prosthesis limited to the mechanically suitable option with a contingency deduction plus allowance for prosthesis already purchased; interest and costs awarded as set out.
- Citation
- KA-A53KJ-224-09/2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (minor): Muhammad Amirul Zamir bin Mohamad Zaher; Next Friend/guardian of Plaintiff: Wan Hasmiza binti Megat Jaafar; Defendant One (driver): Mohd Nujaimy bin Roslan; Defendant Two (owner): Roslan bin Man t/a Roslan bin Man
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Case Number
- KA-A53KJ-224-09/2019 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Motor Accident Personal Injury / Judgment (sesssion Court)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff in part; liability apportioned plaintiff 25% and defendant 75%; damages and interest awarded in favour of plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Liability Apportionment, Traffic Signals, Evidentiary Weight of Investigation Officer, Expert Evidence on Prosthesis, Quantum Assessment, Contributory Negligence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muhammad Amirul Zamir bin Mohamad Zaher
Plaintiff (minor)
Wan Hasmiza binti Megat Jaafar
Next Friend/guardian of Plaintiff
Mohd Nujaimy bin Roslan
Defendant One (driver)
Roslan bin Man t/a Roslan bin Man
Defendant Two (owner)
Procedural Posture
Motor Accident Personal Injury / Judgment (sesssion Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the traffic lights at the junction were functioning at time of accident
- 2 Whether defendant driver ran a red light and caused the collision
- 3 Whether plaintiff failed to take reasonable precautions when entering the junction
Ratio Decidendi
Court found evidence insufficient to positively infer the traffic light on the plaintiff's approach was functioning/green at the moment of impact; even if light had been green plaintiff failed to exercise required caution when entering the main road; liability apportioned 75% to defendant and 25% to plaintiff; damages for specific injuries awarded as assessed and proven special damages for prosthesis limited to the mechanically suitable option with a contingency deduction plus allowance for prosthesis already purchased; interest and costs awarded as set out.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff in part; liability apportioned plaintiff 25% and defendant 75%; damages and interest awarded in favour of plaintiff
Orders
- Liability apportioned: plaintiff 25% and defendant 75%.
- General damages (assessed on 100% liability): RM205,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment