EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD LIFE PARADISE SDN. BHD.
The court held that the bank validly created a lien-holder's caveat under s.281 and s.330 of the National Land Code because the registered proprietor deposited the issue documents as security for a loan thereby establishing the requisite intention; the Malay Reservation Enactment s.10 did not bar registration because the bank fell within the Second Schedule exception (was statutorily recognised), and the statutory lien is separate from and unaffected by third-party charges that were subsequently declared invalid. Consequently the caveat is valid and the bank is entitled to apply for sale by public auction of the listed properties.
- Citation
- WA-24NCVC-769-04/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Life Paradise Sdn. Bhd.; Respondent/plaintiff: Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2019
- Case Number
- WA-24NCVC-769-04/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (originating Summons / Land Enforcement) / Judgment on Originating Summons and Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Originating summons allowed in favour of Export-Import Bank; lien-holder's caveat held valid and enforceable; plaintiff entitled to seek sale by public auction of the listed properties; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Lien by Deposit, Caveat (lien Holder's Caveat), National Land Code S.281 and S.330, Malay Reservation Enactment S.10, Mortgage/charge Vs Statutory Lien, Sale by Public Auction, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Life Paradise Sdn. Bhd.
Appellant/defendant
Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Berhad
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (originating Summons / Land Enforcement) / Judgment on Originating Summons and Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the caveat lodged by the bank as lien-holder under s.281 National Land Code is valid
- 2 Whether the Malay Reservation Enactment s.10 prevents creation/registration of a lien by deposit in this case
- 3 Whether deposit of issue document of title and surrounding circumstances established requisite intention to create a lien
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the bank validly created a lien-holder's caveat under s.281 and s.330 of the National Land Code because the registered proprietor deposited the issue documents as security for a loan thereby establishing the requisite intention; the Malay Reservation Enactment s.10 did not bar registration because the bank fell within the Second Schedule exception (was statutorily recognised), and the statutory lien is separate from and unaffected by third-party charges that were subsequently declared invalid. Consequently the caveat is valid and the bank is entitled to apply for sale by public auction of the listed properties.
Court Disposition
Originating summons allowed in favour of Export-Import Bank; lien-holder's caveat held valid and enforceable; plaintiff entitled to seek sale by public auction of the listed properties; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Originating summons dated 17 October 2019 allowed
- Declaration that the lien-holder's caveat lodged by Export-Import Bank of Malaysia Berhad is valid and enforceable
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment