LIEW CHUI HAR 1. ) LIEW CHUI HAR 2. ) CHIN KHING FEI (as partners under the name and style of Zenith Face & Body Wellness)
Although there are serious issues to be tried (character of RM500,000, existence and legality of the Settlement Agreement, and related disputes), the balance of convenience favors the 2nd Defendant because the plaintiff's claim is essentially monetary, the Settlement Agreement and SPA were unsigned and not established as concluded, the Property is not shown to be integral to the claim to the extent requiring preservation, damages are an adequate remedy, and granting the preservation order would unfairly circumvent the Interpleader OS; accordingly the interim injunction/preservation order is refused and the application dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-22NCVC-416-07/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LIEW CHUI HAR; 1st Defendant: LOW WEE WEE; 2nd Defendant: CHIN KHING FEI; Defendant (counterclaim): TAN CHAP; Defendant (counterclaim): MESSRS TAN CHAP & ASSOCIATES
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2021
- Case Number
- WA-22NCVC-416-07/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Application for Interim Injunction/preservation Order / Inter Partes Application Heard; Application Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application for interim injunction/preservation order dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunction, Preservation Order, Specific Performance, Partnership Dispute, Sale and Purchase Agreement, Money Lending Legality, Damages, Interpleader
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIEW CHUI HAR
Plaintiff
LOW WEE WEE
1st Defendant
CHIN KHING FEI
2nd Defendant
TAN CHAP
Defendant (counterclaim)
MESSRS TAN CHAP & ASSOCIATES
Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil: Application for Interim Injunction/preservation Order / Inter Partes Application Heard; Application Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a bona fide serious issue to be tried
- 2 Whether the Property is integral to the plaintiff's claim or the claim is essentially monetary
- 3 Whether there was a concluded contract/Settlement Agreement to transfer the Property
Ratio Decidendi
Although there are serious issues to be tried (character of RM500,000, existence and legality of the Settlement Agreement, and related disputes), the balance of convenience favors the 2nd Defendant because the plaintiff's claim is essentially monetary, the Settlement Agreement and SPA were unsigned and not established as concluded, the Property is not shown to be integral to the claim to the extent requiring preservation, damages are an adequate remedy, and granting the preservation order would unfairly circumvent the Interpleader OS; accordingly the interim injunction/preservation order is refused and the application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for interim injunction/preservation order dismissed
Orders
- Enc 55 dismissed
- Plaintiff ordered to pay costs of RM5,000 to each of the Defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment