1. CHOONG YOON CHOI (berniaga sebagai Wang Lee Seafood Trading (JM0583147-U) 2. FRANCIS CHOONG WEN CHUNG (berniaga sebagai Wang Lee Seafood Trading (JM0583147-U) 1. CHONG LEONG SHEN 2. YU TUA WEE 3. YU SZE HOU
The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the amended statement of claim pleaded sufficient facts (paras 15-19) to raise special circumstances and pleaded fraud/unconscionable conduct requiring full trial; the Sessions Court erred in striking out the pleadings summarily because the issues were not plainly and obviously unsustainable and should be resolved at trial.
- Citation
- JA-12ANCvC-33-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: CHOONG YOON CHOI (berniaga sebagai Wang Lee Seafood Trading (JM0583147-U)); Appellant/plaintiff: FRANCIS CHOONG WEN CHUNG (berniaga sebagai Wang Lee Seafood Trading (JM0583147-U)); Respondent/second to Fourth Defendant: CHONG LEONG SHEN; Respondent/second to Fourth Defendant: YU TUA WEE; Respondent/second to Fourth Defendant: YU SZE HOU
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2021
- Case Number
- JA-12ANCvC-33-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sessions Court Striking Out Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; striking out order set aside and matter remitted for trial
- Legal Topics
- Lifting Corporate Veil, Striking Out Pleadings Under Order 18 R.19 ROC, Fraud in Equity, Unconscionable Conduct, Particulars of Fraud
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHOONG YOON CHOI (berniaga sebagai Wang Lee Seafood Trading (JM0583147-U))
Appellant/plaintiff
FRANCIS CHOONG WEN CHUNG (berniaga sebagai Wang Lee Seafood Trading (JM0583147-U))
Appellant/plaintiff
CHONG LEONG SHEN
Respondent/second to Fourth Defendant
YU TUA WEE
Respondent/second to Fourth Defendant
YU SZE HOU
Respondent/second to Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sessions Court Striking Out Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pleadings disclosed special circumstances to lift the corporate veil of the first defendant
- 2 Whether fraud was pleaded with sufficient particulars to proceed to trial
- 3 Whether striking out under Order 18 r.19 of the Rules of Court 2012 was appropriate in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the amended statement of claim pleaded sufficient facts (paras 15-19) to raise special circumstances and pleaded fraud/unconscionable conduct requiring full trial; the Sessions Court erred in striking out the pleadings summarily because the issues were not plainly and obviously unsustainable and should be resolved at trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; striking out order set aside and matter remitted for trial
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Order of Sessions Court striking out the Plaintiffs' pleadings set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment