LIM HING LONG 1. TAN EE 2. KASSIM BIN USOP 3. TAN KIYAM 4. TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH 5. TAN CHIN KHEAN 6. TAN CHOO 7. TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP 8. TAN NAI 9. TAN TIAM LOO 10. TAN TIAU SENG 11. TAN TOI @ TAN THOK 12. PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL R
The court held that Enclosure 236 satisfied the need to maintain status quo pending appeal and granted a stay subject to a security deposit of RM100,000 and costs in the cause; Enclosure 251 failed because applicants did not establish special circumstances relating to enforcement of the judgment and disciplinary consequences are not a proper ground for stay, therefore it was dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Citation
- 22NCVC-40-06/2016 (ENCLOSURE 236) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LIM HING LONG; Defendant: TAN EE; Defendant: KASSIM BIN USOP; Defendant: TAN KIYAM; Defendant: TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH; Defendant: TAN CHIN KHEAN; Defendant: TAN CHOO; Defendant: TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP; Defendant: TAN NAI; Defendant: TAN TIAM LOO; Defendant: TAN TIAU SENG; Defendant: TAN TOI @ TAN THOK; Defendant: PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL RENGIT; Defendant: PENTADBIR PEJABAT TANAH DAERAH BATU PAHAT
- Court
- ENCLOSURE 236
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2021
- Case Number
- 22NCVC-40-06/2016 (ENCLOSURE 236) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit Land Dispute / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Enclosure 236 allowed subject to conditions; Enclosure 251 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Special Circumstances, Nugatory Principle, Execution of Judgment, Caveat, Fraudulent Transfer Allegations
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIM HING LONG
Plaintiff
TAN EE
Defendant
KASSIM BIN USOP
Defendant
TAN KIYAM
Defendant
TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH
Defendant
TAN CHIN KHEAN
Defendant
TAN CHOO
Defendant
TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP
Defendant
TAN NAI
Defendant
TAN TIAM LOO
Defendant
TAN TIAU SENG
Defendant
TAN TOI @ TAN THOK
Defendant
PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL RENGIT
Defendant
PENTADBIR PEJABAT TANAH DAERAH BATU PAHAT
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit Land Dispute / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution pending appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the applicants established 'special circumstances' required to grant a stay
- 3 Whether the appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory by execution
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Enclosure 236 satisfied the need to maintain status quo pending appeal and granted a stay subject to a security deposit of RM100,000 and costs in the cause; Enclosure 251 failed because applicants did not establish special circumstances relating to enforcement of the judgment and disciplinary consequences are not a proper ground for stay, therefore it was dismissed with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Enclosure 236 allowed subject to conditions; Enclosure 251 dismissed
Orders
- Enclosure 236: stay of execution granted pending outcome of Court of Appeal Appeal No. J-01(NCVC)(W)-282-06/2020 on condition that RM100,000 be deposited with the Plaintiff's solicitors' client account as stakeholder
- Enclosure 236: costs in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment