LIM HING LONG 1. TAN EE 2. KASSIM BIN USOP 3. TAN KIYAM 4. TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH 5. TAN CHIN KHEAN 6. TAN CHOO 7. TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP 8. TAN NAI 9. TAN TIAM LOO 10. TAN TIAU SENG 11. TAN TOI @ TAN THOK 12. PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL R

LIM HING LONG 1. TAN EE 2. KASSIM BIN USOP 3. TAN KIYAM 4. TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH 5. TAN CHIN KHEAN 6. TAN CHOO 7. TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP 8. TAN NAI 9. TAN TIAM LOO 10. TAN TIAU SENG 11. TAN TOI @ TAN THOK 12. PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL R

The court held that Enclosure 236 satisfied the need to maintain status quo pending appeal and granted a stay subject to a security deposit of RM100,000 and costs in the cause; Enclosure 251 failed because applicants did not establish special circumstances relating to enforcement of the judgment and disciplinary consequences are not a proper ground for stay, therefore it was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Citation
22NCVC-40-06/2016 (ENCLOSURE 236) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: LIM HING LONG; Defendant: TAN EE; Defendant: KASSIM BIN USOP; Defendant: TAN KIYAM; Defendant: TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH; Defendant: TAN CHIN KHEAN; Defendant: TAN CHOO; Defendant: TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP; Defendant: TAN NAI; Defendant: TAN TIAM LOO; Defendant: TAN TIAU SENG; Defendant: TAN TOI @ TAN THOK; Defendant: PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL RENGIT; Defendant: PENTADBIR PEJABAT TANAH DAERAH BATU PAHAT
Court
ENCLOSURE 236
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
27 May 2021
Case Number
22NCVC-40-06/2016 (ENCLOSURE 236) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit Land Dispute / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Enclosure 236 allowed subject to conditions; Enclosure 251 dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Special Circumstances, Nugatory Principle, Execution of Judgment, Caveat, Fraudulent Transfer Allegations
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LIM HING LONG

Plaintiff

TAN EE

Defendant

KASSIM BIN USOP

Defendant

TAN KIYAM

Defendant

TAN CHIN @ TAN CHIN TOH

Defendant

TAN CHIN KHEAN

Defendant

TAN CHOO

Defendant

TAN KIM PAR @ TAN KAP

Defendant

TAN NAI

Defendant

TAN TIAM LOO

Defendant

TAN TIAU SENG

Defendant

TAN TOI @ TAN THOK

Defendant

PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KECIL RENGIT

Defendant

PENTADBIR PEJABAT TANAH DAERAH BATU PAHAT

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit Land Dispute / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a stay of execution pending appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the applicants established 'special circumstances' required to grant a stay
  3. 3 Whether the appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory by execution

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Enclosure 236 satisfied the need to maintain status quo pending appeal and granted a stay subject to a security deposit of RM100,000 and costs in the cause; Enclosure 251 failed because applicants did not establish special circumstances relating to enforcement of the judgment and disciplinary consequences are not a proper ground for stay, therefore it was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Enclosure 236 allowed subject to conditions; Enclosure 251 dismissed

Orders

  • Enclosure 236: stay of execution granted pending outcome of Court of Appeal Appeal No. J-01(NCVC)(W)-282-06/2020 on condition that RM100,000 be deposited with the Plaintiff's solicitors' client account as stakeholder
  • Enclosure 236: costs in the cause