1. ) LIM JUN WU 2. ) YEOH HOCK KOON 1. ) TINAH BINTI OSMAN 2. ) NORFAIZAH BINTI KARIM
The High Court held the Session Court Judge did not act on wrong principles nor misapprehend facts and therefore the quantum awards were not manifestly excessive; awards for osteoarthritis, multiple pelvic fractures and right acetabulum, cost of care (RM537,913.90) and future medical expenses were reasonable and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JA-12B-10-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant: LIM JUN WU; Appellant: YEOH HOCK KOON; Respondent: TINAH BIN OSMAN; Respondent: NORFAIZAN BINTI KARIM
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 September 2025
- Case Number
- JA-12B-10-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Session Court / Judgment on Quantum; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Cost of Care, Future Medical Expenses, Overlapping Injuries, Appellate Intervention, Osteoarthritis, Pelvic Fracture
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIM JUN WU
Appellant
YEOH HOCK KOON
Appellant
TINAH BIN OSMAN
Respondent
NORFAIZAN BINTI KARIM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Session Court / Judgment on Quantum; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the quantum awarded by the Session Court Judge was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether separate awards for overlapping injuries (pelvis and acetabulum) were permissible
- 3 Whether full‑time domestic care (cost of care) was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held the Session Court Judge did not act on wrong principles nor misapprehend facts and therefore the quantum awards were not manifestly excessive; awards for osteoarthritis, multiple pelvic fractures and right acetabulum, cost of care (RM537,913.90) and future medical expenses were reasonable and supported by expert evidence and legal authorities; appeal dismissed and costs awarded to respondents.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Appellants to pay costs of RM5,000.00 subject to allocator fees to the Respondents within fourteen (14) days from date of order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment