LIM LIP ENG Ong Ka Chuan
A political party constituted as an unincorporated society does not have the requisite separate reputation or cause of action to maintain a suit for defamation; section 9 of the Societies Act does not create a distinct reputational right and, applying the public interest rationale underlying Derbyshire and its extensions, a political party cannot sue for defamation. Consequently the political party's claim is unsustainable and the suit is struck out.
- Citation
- 02(i)-25-03/2020(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lim Lip Eng; Respondent (public Officer of Malaysia Chinese Association): Ong Ka Chuan
- Court
- i
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2021
- Case Number
- 02(i)-25-03/2020(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to Federal Court on Leave Question; Grounds of Judgment and Decision Delivered
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decisions of the High Court and Court of Appeal set aside; suit struck out
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Cause of Action, Derbyshire Principle, Freedom of Speech Vs Defamation, Societies Act S9, Government Proceedings Act S3, Civil Law Act S8
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lim Lip Eng
Appellant
Ong Ka Chuan
Respondent (public Officer of Malaysia Chinese Association)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to Federal Court on Leave Question; Grounds of Judgment and Decision Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a political party/society can maintain an action for defamation
- 2 Whether an unincorporated society has the requisite separate reputation to found a cause of action in defamation
- 3 Applicability of the Derbyshire principle and related authorities in Malaysia
Ratio Decidendi
A political party constituted as an unincorporated society does not have the requisite separate reputation or cause of action to maintain a suit for defamation; section 9 of the Societies Act does not create a distinct reputational right and, applying the public interest rationale underlying Derbyshire and its extensions, a political party cannot sue for defamation. Consequently the political party's claim is unsustainable and the suit is struck out.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decisions of the High Court and Court of Appeal set aside; suit struck out
Orders
- Enclosure 6 allowed
- The writ/claim by the respondent (for and on behalf of MCA) is struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment