1. LIM PENG HOCK 2. KHL PILING & CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. 1. CHUAH PENG SAN (Peguambela & Peguamcara, Pemilik tunggal yang beramal sebagai Tetuan Chuah, Halim & Co.) 2. CAHAYA SYNERGY SDN. BHD

1. LIM PENG HOCK 2. KHL PILING & CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. 1. CHUAH PENG SAN (Peguambela & Peguamcara, Pemilik tunggal yang beramal sebagai Tetuan Chuah, Halim & Co.) 2. CAHAYA SYNERGY SDN. BHD

The Court affirmed the High Court's factual findings: the settlement funds were disbursed lawfully pursuant to instructions attributed to the 1st plaintiff (in his capacity as director), the statutory declarations and contemporaneous bank documents were admissible and reliable, the sale and purchase agreement and transfer were validly executed and attested, the proffered recorded digital evidence was inadmissible for lack of pleaded foundation and authentication, and therefore the appellants failed to discharge the burden of proof; appeals dismissed and High Court decision affirmed.

Citation
K-02(NCVC)(W)-327-02/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Parties
Appellant: Lim Peng Hock; Appellant: KHL Piling & Construction Sdn. Bhd.; Respondent: Chuah Peng San; Respondent: Cahaya Synergy Sdn. Bhd.
Court
NCVC
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
19 February 2021
Case Number
K-02(NCVC)(W)-327-02/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Misappropriation of Client Funds, Caveat and Revocation, Non Est Factum, Statutory Declarations, Admissibility of Digital Evidence, Assessment of Damages
Source Language
Malay/English
Civil Law Contract Property Law Evidence Law Equity and Trusts Civil Procedure Specific Performance Misappropriation of Client Funds +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lim Peng Hock

Appellant

KHL Piling & Construction Sdn. Bhd.

Appellant

Chuah Peng San

Respondent

Cahaya Synergy Sdn. Bhd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the solicitor's disbursement of settlement funds (Lliasco funds) was lawful
  2. 2 Whether the solicitor mismanaged or unlawfully withheld funds belonging to the purchaser
  3. 3 Whether the 1st plaintiff executed the sale and purchase agreement and related transfer

Ratio Decidendi

The Court affirmed the High Court's factual findings: the settlement funds were disbursed lawfully pursuant to instructions attributed to the 1st plaintiff (in his capacity as director), the statutory declarations and contemporaneous bank documents were admissible and reliable, the sale and purchase agreement and transfer were validly executed and attested, the proffered recorded digital evidence was inadmissible for lack of pleaded foundation and authentication, and therefore the appellants failed to discharge the burden of proof; appeals dismissed and High Court decision affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed
  • High Court decision of 28-30 January 2018 affirmed