RAHMAH BINTI ARSHAD 1. ) ABDUL MALIK BIN YUSOFF 2. ) MOHD SAZALI BIN SAAT
The court held that the three-year limitation period in s.7(5) Civil Law Act 1956 is computed by Gregorian calendar years such that it expires one day before the same calendar date three years later; accordingly the limitation expired on 26.12.2023 and the writ filed on 27.12.2023 was time-barred, so the Sessions...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JA-12A-7-10/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff Second: Rahmah binti Arshad; Respondent / Defendant First: Abdul Malik bin Yusoff; Respondent / Defendant Second: Mohd Sazali bin Saat; Plaintiff First: Muhammad Zulilmi bin Zaini
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2025
- Case Number
- JA-12A-7-10/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Judgment on Limitation (appeal Disposed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Computation of Time, Dependency Claim Under Fatal Accidents Provisions, Pleading and Strike Out
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rahmah binti Arshad
Appellant / Plaintiff Second
Abdul Malik bin Yusoff
Respondent / Defendant First
Mohd Sazali bin Saat
Respondent / Defendant Second
Muhammad Zulilmi bin Zaini
Plaintiff First
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Judgment on Limitation (appeal Disposed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dependency claim under s.7(1) Civil Law Act 1956 is time-barred by s.7(5)
- 2 How to compute the three-year limitation period under s.7(5) (whether the day of death is included)
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the three-year limitation period in s.7(5) Civil Law Act 1956 is computed by Gregorian calendar years such that it expires one day before the same calendar date three years later; accordingly the limitation expired on 26.12.2023 and the writ filed on 27.12.2023 was time-barred, so the Sessions Court's order striking the claim was confirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment