1. ) LING PEEK HOE 2. ) LING BOON HUAT 3. ) DING TOH BIEW (M3) 22-45-2008 4. ) DING TOH GIEN (M3) 22-45-2008 1. ) DING SIEW CHING 2. ) GOLDEN STAR 3. ) DING TOH BIEW 4. ) DING TOH GIEN 5. ) DING TOH LEI 6. ) LING PEEK HOE (M3) 22-45-2008
The court held the pleading objection was barred by res judicata because the trial judgment expressly awarded special, general and exemplary damages to be assessed and the defendants had not raised the pleading point during trial or appeals; legal fees set out in signed retainers and refresher agreements were actual costs 'incurred' even if unpaid and are recoverable as special damages on an indemnity basis in a fraud action; affidavits exchanged for assessment could stand effectively as pleadings for the assessment; accordingly the plaintiffs were awarded special damages (legal fees and disbursements), general damages and punitive damages and interest at 5% p.a. from the writ date;...
- Citation
- (M1) 22-203-2006, (M3) 22-45-2008 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ling Peek Hoe; Plaintiff: Ling Boon Huat; Defendant: Ding Siew Ching; Defendant: Golden Star; Defendant: Ding Toh Biew; Defendant: Ding Toh Gien; Defendant: Ding Toh Lei
- Court
- M1
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2022
- Case Number
- (M1) 22-203-2006, (M3) 22-45-2008 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (fraud) / Assessment of Damages (post‑trial)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs. Damages awarded in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendants in the total sum of RM5,135,951.76; interest at 5% per annum from date of filing of writ until full realisation; costs to plaintiffs. Liability not apportioned between defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Special Damages, General Damages, Exemplary/punitive Damages, Indemnity Costs, Pleading Requirements, Res Judicata, Third Party Proceedings, Assessment of Damages, Interest on Judgment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ling Peek Hoe
Plaintiff
Ling Boon Huat
Plaintiff
Ding Siew Ching
Defendant
Golden Star
Defendant
Ding Toh Biew
Defendant
Ding Toh Gien
Defendant
Ding Toh Lei
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (fraud) / Assessment of Damages (post‑trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal fees incurred in litigation are recoverable as special damages on an indemnity basis
- 2 Whether special damages not particularised in the statement of claim may be recovered at assessment (pleading point)
- 3 Whether agreed but unpaid legal fees constitute 'incurred' costs recoverable as special damages
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the pleading objection was barred by res judicata because the trial judgment expressly awarded special, general and exemplary damages to be assessed and the defendants had not raised the pleading point during trial or appeals; legal fees set out in signed retainers and refresher agreements were actual costs 'incurred' even if unpaid and are recoverable as special damages on an indemnity basis in a fraud action; affidavits exchanged for assessment could stand effectively as pleadings for the assessment; accordingly the plaintiffs were awarded special damages (legal fees and disbursements), general damages and punitive damages and interest at 5% p.a. from the writ date;...
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs. Damages awarded in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendants in the total sum of RM5,135,951.76; interest at 5% per annum from date of filing of writ until full realisation; costs to plaintiffs. Liability not apportioned between defendants.
Orders
- Defendants to pay plaintiffs special damages RM3,135,951.76 (comprising legal fees and disbursements adjusted for deduction)
- Defendants to pay plaintiffs general damages RM1,000,000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment