Wong Peng Hung 1. ) TSI Domain Sdn Bhd 2. ) TSI Property Management Sdn Bhd PIHAK KETIGA Ketua pengarah Perumahan Negara
Plaintiffs lack locus standi to pursue claims concerning common property because such claims must be brought by the management corporation under s59 Strata Management Act 2013; the claims are duplicative of FRMC's existing suit and constitute an abuse and multiplicity of proceedings; accordingly the writ and statement of claim are struck out and defendants' application is allowed with costs.
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-271-05/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintif: WONG PENG HUNG; Plaintif: PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN FIRST RESIDENCE; Defendan: TSI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD; Defendan: TSI DOMAIN SDN BHD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2023
- Case Number
- WA-22NCvC-271-05/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Strike Out Application Under Rules of Court / High Court Judgment on Application to Strike Out Writ and Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Defendants' application allowed; writ and statement of claim struck out for lack of locus standi and multiplicity/abuse of process.
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Common Property, Multiplicity of Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Strike Out, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG PENG HUNG
Plaintif
PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN FIRST RESIDENCE
Plaintif
TSI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD
Defendan
TSI DOMAIN SDN BHD
Defendan
Procedural Posture
Civil Strike Out Application Under Rules of Court / High Court Judgment on Application to Strike Out Writ and Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether individual parcel owners have locus standi to sue in respect of common property under Strata Management Act 2013 s59
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs' proceedings are multiplicity of proceedings and an abuse of process given an existing suit by the management corporation (FRMC)
- 3 Whether the writ and statement of claim ought to be struck out under Rules of Court (Rule 18(1)(b),(d) and Rule 92)
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs lack locus standi to pursue claims concerning common property because such claims must be brought by the management corporation under s59 Strata Management Act 2013; the claims are duplicative of FRMC's existing suit and constitute an abuse and multiplicity of proceedings; accordingly the writ and statement of claim are struck out and defendants' application is allowed with costs.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application allowed; writ and statement of claim struck out for lack of locus standi and multiplicity/abuse of process.
Orders
- Writ dated 17.05.2022 and Statement of Claim dated 15.06.2022 are struck out
- Costs awarded to defendants in the sum of RM5,000.00 subject to taxation (fi alokatur)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment