1. ) 3 TWO SQUARE SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 617273 – X) 2. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN 3 TWO SQUARE 1. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN 3 TWO SQUARE 2. ) 3 TWO SQUARE SDN BHD (No. Syarikat: 617273 – X)
The Court held that (1) SMA s28(2) vested the JMB’s rights in the management corporation so plaintiff had locus to sue for pre-incorporation claims; (2) the developer’s role as managing agent was unlawful under BCPA s26 so management fees collected without lawful appointment must be refunded for the period where no valid appointment existed; (3) the car park parcels were used commercially and not as accessory parcels to the Penthouse so the management corporation could lawfully charge management and sinking fund in respect of those car parks; (4) plaintiff failed to prove an enforceable tenancy for the office on common property hence rental claims (except vacant possession) were set...
- Citation
- B-02(IM) (NCVC)-530-03/2017, B-02(NCVC)(W)-2149-10/2017 & B-02(NCVC)(W)-2155-10/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: 3 Two Square Sdn Bhd; Respondent/plaintiff: Perbadanan Pengurusan 3 Two Square
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1900
- Case Number
- B-02(IM) (NCVC)-530-03/2017, B-02(NCVC)(W)-2149-10/2017 & B-02(NCVC)(W)-2155-10/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Final Judgment on Appeals
- Outcome
- Mixed: parts of appeals allowed and dismissed as follows: Appeal B-02(IM)(NCVC)-530-03/2017 dismissed as academic; Perbadanan Pengurusan 3 Two Square's appeals (in Appeal B-02(NCVC)(W)-2155-10/2017) in respect of Suit 510 and Suit 516 allowed; 3 Two Square Sdn Bhd's appeals (in Appeal B-02(NCVC)(W)-2149-10/2017) in...
- Legal Topics
- Locus to Sue Pre Incorporation, Managing Agent Independence and Illegality, Recovery of Management and Sinking Fund Charges, Accessory Parcel in Strata Title, Vacant Possession and Rental, Costs and Interest
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
3 Two Square Sdn Bhd
Appellant/defendant
Perbadanan Pengurusan 3 Two Square
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Final Judgment on Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether management corporation (plaintiff) has locus to sue for rights of JMB pre-incorporation under SMA s28(2)
- 2 Whether developer/parcel owner could act as managing agent and lawfulness of fees collected under BCPA s26
- 3 Whether car park parcels constituted accessory parcels to the Penthouse under STA ss4,34(2),69 and thus immune from separate charges
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that (1) SMA s28(2) vested the JMB’s rights in the management corporation so plaintiff had locus to sue for pre-incorporation claims; (2) the developer’s role as managing agent was unlawful under BCPA s26 so management fees collected without lawful appointment must be refunded for the period where no valid appointment existed; (3) the car park parcels were used commercially and not as accessory parcels to the Penthouse so the management corporation could lawfully charge management and sinking fund in respect of those car parks; (4) plaintiff failed to prove an enforceable tenancy for the office on common property hence rental claims (except vacant possession) were set...
Court Disposition
Mixed: parts of appeals allowed and dismissed as follows: Appeal B-02(IM)(NCVC)-530-03/2017 dismissed as academic; Perbadanan Pengurusan 3 Two Square's appeals (in Appeal B-02(NCVC)(W)-2155-10/2017) in respect of Suit 510 and Suit 516 allowed; 3 Two Square Sdn Bhd's appeals (in Appeal B-02(NCVC)(W)-2149-10/2017) in...
Orders
- Appeal No. B-02(IM)(NCVC)-530-03/2017 dismissed as academic
- Plaintiff (management corporation) has locus to sue for JMB rights under SMA s28(2) for pre-incorporation period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment