MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD 1. ) Q DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) LOW MOI ING 3. ) PHOA BOON TING 4. ) CHAN JUI HIN

MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD 1. ) Q DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) LOW MOI ING 3. ) PHOA BOON TING 4. ) CHAN JUI HIN

Summary judgment was granted because the plaintiff proved that condition precedents were fulfilled (charges registered) before disbursement, the defendants admitted indebtedness and made part payments, the Facility Agreement permits the lender to waive conditions and to vary terms (binding the borrower), the certificate of indebtedness is conclusive, and the defendants failed to raise bona fide triable issues to defeat summary judgment.

Citation
WA-22NCC-810-11/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: Malayan Banking Berhad; Defendant: Q Development Sdn Bhd; Defendant: Low Moi Ing; Defendant: Phoa Boon Ting; Defendant: Chan Jui Hin
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
28 June 2024
Case Number
WA-22NCC-810-11/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Suit (banking and Loan Enforcement) / Summary Judgment (judgment Granted)
Outcome
Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Facility Agreement, Registration/perfection of Charges, Guarantees and Suretyship, Condition Precedent, Due Diligence and Regulatory Obligations, Variation of Contractual Terms, Certificate of Indebtedness
Source Language
Malay/English
Banking Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Property Law Guarantee Law Summary Judgment Facility Agreement Registration/perfection of Charges +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Malayan Banking Berhad

Plaintiff

Q Development Sdn Bhd

Defendant

Low Moi Ing

Defendant

Phoa Boon Ting

Defendant

Chan Jui Hin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Civil Suit (banking and Loan Enforcement) / Summary Judgment (judgment Granted)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Facility Agreement was void or inoperative because charges were disputed and condition precedent not satisfied
  2. 2 Whether Land Charges were validly created and registered prior to disbursements
  3. 3 Whether triable issues exist to defeat summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment was granted because the plaintiff proved that condition precedents were fulfilled (charges registered) before disbursement, the defendants admitted indebtedness and made part payments, the Facility Agreement permits the lender to waive conditions and to vary terms (binding the borrower), the certificate of indebtedness is conclusive, and the defendants failed to raise bona fide triable issues to defeat summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff

Orders

  • Summary judgment entered in favour of the Plaintiff
  • Costs fixed at RM 10,000.00 subject to allocator