TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT : 200866-W) 1. TAN SOOI LEK @ TAN CHOON GUAN (NO. K/P: 481024-07-5091) 2. TAN THIAM HOCK (NO. K/P: 810907-07-5743) 3. NG TIANG KUAN (NO. K/P: 740814-08-6223)
Appeal dismissed because the mandatory interlocutory relief sought had become academic as Tenaga had completed the maintenance works; Tenaga failed to demonstrate the unusually strong/clear case and special circumstances required for mandatory interlocutory relief; statutory provisions (s13 entry power and s37 criminal sanction) provide adequate and effective remedies and the statutory mode must be followed; no substantive issue remained to be tried and balance of convenience did not favor equitable mandatory relief.
- Citation
- P-02(IM)(NCVC)-1471-07/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Tenaga Nasional Berhad; Respondent/defendant: Tan Sooi Lek @ Tan Choon Guan; Respondent/defendant: Tan Thiam Hock; Respondent/defendant: Ng Tiang Kuan
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1900
- Case Number
- P-02(IM)(NCVC)-1471-07/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (interlocutory Injunction) / Appeal From High Court (challenge to Refusal/cancellation of Ex Parte Interlocutory Mandatory Injunction)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Interlocutory Injunction, Interlocutory Relief, Statutory Right of Entry, Criminal Sanction for Unlawful Activity Near Electrical Installations, Balance of Convenience, Academic/redundant Relief
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Appellant/plaintiff
Tan Sooi Lek @ Tan Choon Guan
Respondent/defendant
Tan Thiam Hock
Respondent/defendant
Ng Tiang Kuan
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (interlocutory Injunction) / Appeal From High Court (challenge to Refusal/cancellation of Ex Parte Interlocutory Mandatory Injunction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a mandatory interlocutory injunction should be granted despite maintenance works having been completed making the relief academic
- 2 Whether statutory remedies under the Electricity Supply Act 1990 are adequate and preclude equitable mandatory relief
- 3 Whether the applicant demonstrated an unusually strong/clear case and special circumstances required for a mandatory interlocutory injunction
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal dismissed because the mandatory interlocutory relief sought had become academic as Tenaga had completed the maintenance works; Tenaga failed to demonstrate the unusually strong/clear case and special circumstances required for mandatory interlocutory relief; statutory provisions (s13 entry power and s37 criminal sanction) provide adequate and effective remedies and the statutory mode must be followed; no substantive issue remained to be tried and balance of convenience did not favor equitable mandatory relief.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs of RM3,000.00 awarded to each respondent, subject to fi alokatur
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment