MICKELSON GERALD WAYNE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Federal Court allowed the appeal, holding the prosecution failed to prove the requisite subjective intention under section 300(c) Penal Code (intention to inflict the specific injury sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death); the conviction for murder under s.302 was unsafe and was substituted with conviction under s.304(b) Penal Code; sentence imposed was seven years’ imprisonment from date of arrest.
- Citation
- 05(M)-312-12-2019 (W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mickelson Gerald Wayne; Respondent: Public Prosecutor
- Court
- M
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2021
- Case Number
- 05(M)-312-12-2019 (W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Federal Court (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; conviction and sentence for murder under s.302 Penal Code set aside and substituted with conviction under s.304(b) Penal Code; sentence of 7 years imprisonment imposed effective from date of arrest.
- Legal Topics
- Private Defence, Murder Vs Culpable Homicide, Mens Rea Under Section 300(c), Exceptions to Section 300 (exception 4)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mickelson Gerald Wayne
Appellant
Public Prosecutor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Federal Court (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant validly exercised the right of private defence under sections 96,97,99,100 and 102 Penal Code
- 2 Whether the mens rea required for murder under section 300(c) Penal Code was proved
- 3 Whether Exception 4 to section 300 Penal Code (sudden fight) applied to reduce culpability
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court allowed the appeal, holding the prosecution failed to prove the requisite subjective intention under section 300(c) Penal Code (intention to inflict the specific injury sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death); the conviction for murder under s.302 was unsafe and was substituted with conviction under s.304(b) Penal Code; sentence imposed was seven years’ imprisonment from date of arrest.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; conviction and sentence for murder under s.302 Penal Code set aside and substituted with conviction under s.304(b) Penal Code; sentence of 7 years imprisonment imposed effective from date of arrest.
Orders
- Conviction under section 302 Penal Code set aside
- Conviction substituted to section 304(b) Penal Code (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment