1. ) FONG POH SHENG 2. ) CHONG CHEW TING 3. ) SWEE YOKE SIA 4. ) KANG CHING YIN 5. ) YIP POH LANG 6. ) NICHOLAS SHIM TENG YAW 7. ) TAN THUAN THUNG 8. ) ANG IGOR YEN CHUEN 9. ) SHEILA LUZ TAGUIANG PARIN 10. ) TAN SIEW EE 11. ) FOO SIEW LEE 1
On the balance of probabilities the court awarded LAD only to specific purchasers where the defendant had admitted delay and had specifically acknowledged liability to those purchasers; for other purchasers the defendant was entitled to rely on valid extensions obtained and on the prospective effect of subsequent authority; COVID-19 temporary measures were relevant to calculation; interest at 5% p.a. was awarded from date of order until full payment; no costs awarded.
- Citation
- BA-24NCvC-2506-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Fong Poh Sheng & Ors; Defendant: Millenium Creation Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2024
- Case Number
- BA-24NCvC-2506-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim for Liquidated Ascertain Damages Under the Housing Development (control and Licensing) Act 1966 / Judgment (originating Summons) 26 February 2025
- Outcome
- Partial judgment for plaintiffs: Defendant ordered to pay LAD to specified plaintiffs only; other claims dismissed; interest at 5% p.a. from date of order until full payment; no costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidated Damages, Extension of Time, Ultra Vires, Prospective Overruling, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fong Poh Sheng & Ors
Plaintiffs
Millenium Creation Sdn. Bhd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Liquidated Ascertain Damages Under the Housing Development (control and Licensing) Act 1966 / Judgment (originating Summons) 26 February 2025
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contractual delivery period is 36 months (prescribed Schedule H) or 48 months as modified by the Controller/Minister
- 2 Whether the Controller/Timbalan Pengawal had lawful power under Regulation 11(3) HDR to extend the delivery period or whether such extensions are ultra vires s.24 HDA
- 3 Whether purchasers can claim retrospective LAD after accepting or benefiting from extensions and after delivery of vacant possession
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court awarded LAD only to specific purchasers where the defendant had admitted delay and had specifically acknowledged liability to those purchasers; for other purchasers the defendant was entitled to rely on valid extensions obtained and on the prospective effect of subsequent authority; COVID-19 temporary measures were relevant to calculation; interest at 5% p.a. was awarded from date of order until full payment; no costs awarded.
Court Disposition
Partial judgment for plaintiffs: Defendant ordered to pay LAD to specified plaintiffs only; other claims dismissed; interest at 5% p.a. from date of order until full payment; no costs awarded.
Orders
- Defendant to pay RM8328.00 to Plaintiff No.3
- Defendant to pay RM3361.72 to Plaintiff No.5
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment