MIR SOLUTIONS SDN. BHD. EARLY YEARS DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD.
Service by registered post to the defendant's registered and business addresses was regular and supported by affidavit and posting receipts; defendant had actual knowledge of the proceedings and failed to enter appearance; defendant breached mandatory time limit to file supporting affidavit for the setting-aside application and provided no adequate excuse; defendant did not disclose a prima facie meritorious defence or deny promises to repair and return equipment; prior proceedings and settlement did not bar the distinct claims now before the court. Therefore the application to set aside the default judgment was dismissed and costs awarded to the plaintiff.
- Citation
- A52NCVC-199-05-2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: MIR SOLUTIONS SDN. BHD.; Defendant: EARLY YEARS DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD.
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 December 2020
- Case Number
- A52NCVC-199-05-2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim Equipment Lease and Related Damages; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Interlocutory Application Under Order 13 Rule 8 Rules of Court 2012 at Sessions Court (shah Alam)
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Service of Process by Registered Post, Compliance With Court Rules and Time Limits, Estoppel, Arbitration/previous Proceedings Effect, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIR SOLUTIONS SDN. BHD.
Plaintiff
EARLY YEARS DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim Equipment Lease and Related Damages; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Interlocutory Application Under Order 13 Rule 8 Rules of Court 2012 at Sessions Court (shah Alam)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of writ and statement of claim on defendant was valid and regular
- 2 Whether defendant complied with procedural requirement to file supporting affidavit within prescribed time
- 3 Whether prior related suit or its suspension bound the current proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Service by registered post to the defendant's registered and business addresses was regular and supported by affidavit and posting receipts; defendant had actual knowledge of the proceedings and failed to enter appearance; defendant breached mandatory time limit to file supporting affidavit for the setting-aside application and provided no adequate excuse; defendant did not disclose a prima facie meritorious defence or deny promises to repair and return equipment; prior proceedings and settlement did not bar the distinct claims now before the court. Therefore the application to set aside the default judgment was dismissed and costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment dismissed
Orders
- Application to set aside default judgment dismissed
- Defendant to pay costs to plaintiff in the sum of RM3,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment