MMC GAMUDA KVMRT (PDP SSP) SDN BHD 1. ) SAPURA HOLDINGS SDN BHD 2. ) EV-DYNAMIC SDN BHD

Not specified in the provided excerpt.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: WA-24C-142-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties: Claimant: Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd; Claimant: EV-Dynamic Sdn Bhd; Respondent: MMC Gamuda KVMRT (PDP SSP) Sdn Bhd
Court: High Court
Jurisdiction: Malaysia
Judgment Date: 9 September 2024
Case Number: WA-24C-142-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture: Adjudication Under Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act 2012 (originating Summons) / Enforcement of Adjudication Decision (originating Summons)
Outcome: Not stated in the provided excerpt.
Legal Topics: Adjudication Decision Enforcement, Payment Claim, Construction Contract, CIPAA

Construction Law Adjudication Contract Law Enforcement Proceedings Adjudication Decision Enforcement Payment Claim Construction Contract CIPAA

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Sapura Holdings Sdn Bhd

Claimant

EV-Dynamic Sdn Bhd

Claimant

MMC Gamuda KVMRT (PDP SSP) Sdn Bhd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adjudication Under Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act 2012 (originating Summons) / Enforcement of Adjudication Decision (originating Summons)

Legal Issues

1 Whether the adjudication decision dated 14.8.2023 (as amended 23.8.2023) should be enforced by the court
2 Whether any challenge to the adjudication decision succeeds (jurisdictional challenge, procedural irregularity, or other grounds to set aside)

Ratio Decidendi

Not specified in the provided excerpt.

Court Disposition

Not stated in the provided excerpt.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.