MODALKU VENTURES SDN BHD E-TECH IT SDN BHD
The Notice of Assignment unequivocally and validly assigned absolutely the invoices and receivables to the Plaintiff; the Defendant failed to raise a bona fide triable issue because the alleged verbal agreement was inadmissible and inconsistent with the written Notice which prohibited variation without Plaintiff's written consent, the Defendant had acknowledged receipt of goods as in good condition, equitable set-off was not established as not sufficiently connected, and concurrent proceedings against assignor and debtor do not amount to double recovery while debt remains unpaid; accordingly summary judgment principles applied and the Defendant's counterclaim amounted to abuse of process...
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-303-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- PLAINTIFF: Modalku Ventures Sdn Bhd; DEFENDANT: E-Tech IT Sdn Bhd; THIRD PARTY: Able Enterprise (M) Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2023
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-303-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (commercial Division) / Summary Judgment (order 14 ROC 2012) and Strike Out (order 18 R 19 ROC 2012) Applications
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of the Plaintiff on the assigned invoices; Defendant's counterclaim struck out as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Receivables, Factoring, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Parol Evidence Rule, Equitable Set Off, Abuse of Process, Multiplicity of Actions/double Recovery
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Modalku Ventures Sdn Bhd
PLAINTIFF
E-Tech IT Sdn Bhd
DEFENDANT
Able Enterprise (M) Sdn Bhd
THIRD PARTY
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (commercial Division) / Summary Judgment (order 14 ROC 2012) and Strike Out (order 18 R 19 ROC 2012) Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a verbal agreement between Defendant and assignor Able varied the written Notice of Assignment
- 2 Whether the Notice of Assignment contravened protections under the Sale of Goods Act 1957
- 3 Whether Defendant is entitled to an independent/equitable set-off against Able for returned goods and credit notes
Ratio Decidendi
The Notice of Assignment unequivocally and validly assigned absolutely the invoices and receivables to the Plaintiff; the Defendant failed to raise a bona fide triable issue because the alleged verbal agreement was inadmissible and inconsistent with the written Notice which prohibited variation without Plaintiff's written consent, the Defendant had acknowledged receipt of goods as in good condition, equitable set-off was not established as not sufficiently connected, and concurrent proceedings against assignor and debtor do not amount to double recovery while debt remains unpaid; accordingly summary judgment principles applied and the Defendant's counterclaim amounted to abuse of process...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of the Plaintiff on the assigned invoices; Defendant's counterclaim struck out as frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of process
Orders
- Summary judgment entered for the Plaintiff in respect of the unpaid assigned invoices
- Defendant ordered to pay the outstanding sum relating to the assigned invoices into the Designated Account (sum claimed RM1,235,735.71 as at 5.5.2022)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment