(1) MARZAIDI BIN MOHAMMAD (No. K/P: 690528-03-5633) [membawa tindakan sebagai penjaga/sahabat wakil dan wakil litigasi kepada MUHAMMAD MUHRIZ BIN MARZAIDI (No. K/P: 040617-05-0283) (2) THAIB BIN MUSTAFA (No. K/P: 641214-05-5059) [membawa ti
The court held the plaintiffs’ pleadings disclosed a reasonable cause of action raising serious triable issues (including the effect of the Stakeholder and Release Agreements and the applicability of the Faraid order) that could not be resolved summarily; the Release Agreement was material and admissible despite a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-629-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff 1; Guardian Ad Litem/legal Representative for Muhammad Muhriz Bin Marzaidi: Marzaidi bin Mohammad; Plaintiff 2; Litigation Representative for Mustafa Bin Ab Samad (deceased): Thaib bin Mustafa; Defendant: Mohamed Affendi bin Khairuddin
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2021
- Case Number
- WA-22NCvC-629-08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Applications (strike‑out Under Order 18 R19 and Application to Expunge Exhibit Under Order 41 R6)
- Outcome
- Defendant's strike‑out application (Kandungan 9) dismissed; defendant's application to expunge exhibit (Kandungan 14) dismissed as academic/no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Application, Res Judicata, Limitation, Mediation and Settlement Agreements, Stakeholder/release Agreements, Admissibility of Confidential Documents
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marzaidi bin Mohammad
Plaintiff 1; Guardian Ad Litem/legal Representative for Muhammad Muhriz Bin Marzaidi
Thaib bin Mustafa
Plaintiff 2; Litigation Representative for Mustafa Bin Ab Samad (deceased)
Mohamed Affendi bin Khairuddin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Applications (strike‑out Under Order 18 R19 and Application to Expunge Exhibit Under Order 41 R6)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs’ writ and amended statement of claim disclose a reasonable cause of action and are strike‑outable under Order 18 r19
- 2 Whether the Syariah Faraid order applies to the MAS settlement funds
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by limitation, laches or res judicata
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the plaintiffs’ pleadings disclosed a reasonable cause of action raising serious triable issues (including the effect of the Stakeholder and Release Agreements and the applicability of the Faraid order) that could not be resolved summarily; the Release Agreement was material and admissible despite a confidentiality clause that permitted disclosure by court order; accordingly the strike‑out application and the application to expunge the exhibit were dismissed (Kandungan 9 dismissed with costs; Kandungan 14 dismissed without costs).
Court Disposition
Defendant's strike‑out application (Kandungan 9) dismissed; defendant's application to expunge exhibit (Kandungan 14) dismissed as academic/no order as to costs
Orders
- Kandungan 9 dismissed with costs of MYR 2,500 to be paid by Defendant to Plaintiffs, subject to alocatur
- Kandungan 14 dismissed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment