MOHAMED FARID BIN ALI AKBAR ( wakil diri dan benefisiari kepada ZURITA BINTI MOHAMED TAIB) ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD

MOHAMED FARID BIN ALI AKBAR ( wakil diri dan benefisiari kepada ZURITA BINTI MOHAMED TAIB) ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim because the deceased deliberately or recklessly misrepresented her health in the application and conditional acceptance, breaching the duty of disclosure under Schedule 9 of IFSA, which entitled the defendant to avoid the takaful cover and validly repudiate the claim.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
JA-22NCvC-186-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohamed Farid bin Ali Akbar (wakil diri dan benefisiari kepada Zurita binti Mohamed Taib, deceased); Defendant: Etiqa Takaful Berhad (266243D)
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
2 August 2023
Case Number
JA-22NCvC-186-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit Takaful/insurance Dispute (mortgage Reducing Term Takaful) / Judgment at High Court (trial); Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs; repudiation of claim upheld due to breach of duty of disclosure
Legal Topics
Duty of Utmost Good Faith (uberrimae Fides), Duty of Disclosure, Misrepresentation (deliberate/reckless), Locus Standi/capacity to Sue, Waiver and Estoppel, Repudiation of Insurance/takaful Claim
Insurance/takaful Contract Law Insurance Regulatory Law Civil Procedure Duty of Utmost Good Faith (uberrimae Fides) Duty of Disclosure Misrepresentation (deliberate/reckless) Locus Standi/capacity to Sue +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Farid bin Ali Akbar (wakil diri dan benefisiari kepada Zurita binti Mohamed Taib, deceased)

Plaintiff

Etiqa Takaful Berhad (266243D)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit Takaful/insurance Dispute (mortgage Reducing Term Takaful) / Judgment at High Court (trial); Appeal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has capacity/locus standi to sue as wakil diri and beneficiary
  2. 2 Whether the deceased breached the duty of disclosure/committed misrepresentation in the takaful application and conditional acceptance
  3. 3 Whether waiver/estoppel or failure to challenge repudiation precluded the plaintiff's claim

Ratio Decidendi

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim because the deceased deliberately or recklessly misrepresented her health in the application and conditional acceptance, breaching the duty of disclosure under Schedule 9 of IFSA, which entitled the defendant to avoid the takaful cover and validly repudiate the claim.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs; repudiation of claim upheld due to breach of duty of disclosure

Orders

  • Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs
  • Repudiation of the takaful claim upheld and defendant entitled to avoid cover and refund contributions debited