MOHD ALI BIN AMIR BATCHA 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) 4. ) KETUA POLIS NEGARA, MALAYSIA 5. ) DATO AHMAD RAGIB BIN HJ. AHMAD SALLEH 6. ) HAMDAN BIN NORDIN 7. ) RADZUAN BIN SHUAIB

MOHD ALI BIN AMIR BATCHA 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) 4. ) KETUA POLIS NEGARA, MALAYSIA 5. ) DATO AHMAD RAGIB BIN HJ. AHMAD SALLEH 6. ) HAMDAN BIN NORDIN 7. ) RADZUAN BIN SHUAIB

Application dismissed because applicant failed to produce the arbitration agreement as required by s.38(2)(b), therefore the MATE award was issued without jurisdiction and the High Court cannot recognise or enforce such award or add/alter its substantive allocations under s.38; consequent costs awarded to respondents.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
BA-24NCC(ARB)-5-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Applicant: MOHD ALI BIN AMIR BATCHA; Respondent: KERAJAAN MALAYSIA; Respondent: MENTERI HAL EHWAL DALAM NEGERI; Respondent: POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA; Respondent: KETUA POLIS NEGARA; Respondent: DATO AHMAD RAGIB BIN HJ. AHMAD SALLEH; Respondent: HAMDAN BIN NORDIN; Respondent: RADZUAN BIN SHUAIB; Respondent: MOHD ARIS BIN MOHD AMIN; Respondent: WAHYUDIN BIN TALIB; Respondent: TAN SRI RAHIM BIN MOHD NOOR; Respondent: JAMALUDIN BIN ARSHAD; Respondent: MOK SIEW HOONG; Respondent: ABDUL KARIM BIN ABU HASSAN
Court
ARB
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
18 August 2022
Case Number
BA-24NCC(ARB)-5-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award Under S.38 Arbitration Act 2005 / Judgment Dismissing Application
Outcome
Originating Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Existence and Form of Arbitration Agreement, Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal, Scope of S.38 Arbitration Act 2005, Costs
Arbitration Civil Procedure Administrative Law Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award Existence and Form of Arbitration Agreement Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal Scope of S.38 Arbitration Act 2005 Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MOHD ALI BIN AMIR BATCHA

Applicant

KERAJAAN MALAYSIA

Respondent

MENTERI HAL EHWAL DALAM NEGERI

Respondent

POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA

Respondent

KETUA POLIS NEGARA

Respondent

DATO AHMAD RAGIB BIN HJ. AHMAD SALLEH

Respondent

HAMDAN BIN NORDIN

Respondent

RADZUAN BIN SHUAIB

Respondent

MOHD ARIS BIN MOHD AMIN

Respondent

WAHYUDIN BIN TALIB

Respondent

TAN SRI RAHIM BIN MOHD NOOR

Respondent

JAMALUDIN BIN ARSHAD

Respondent

MOK SIEW HOONG

Respondent

ABDUL KARIM BIN ABU HASSAN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award Under S.38 Arbitration Act 2005 / Judgment Dismissing Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties
  2. 2 Whether applicant complied with s.38(2)(b) by producing the original or certified arbitration agreement
  3. 3 Whether the MATE had jurisdiction to make the award absent an arbitration agreement

Ratio Decidendi

Application dismissed because applicant failed to produce the arbitration agreement as required by s.38(2)(b), therefore the MATE award was issued without jurisdiction and the High Court cannot recognise or enforce such award or add/alter its substantive allocations under s.38; consequent costs awarded to respondents.

Court Disposition

Originating Summons dismissed

Orders

  • Applicant's Originating Summons dismissed
  • Applicant ordered to pay costs of RM10,000.00 to respondents (subject to allocator fees)